Read the Gospel of Thomas. It's not canon, but it surely could have been depending on the politics of the day.
To answer your question…probably not.
>There has been much speculation on the relationship of
Thomas to the canonical Gospels. Many Sayings in Thomas have
parallels with the New Testament Sayings, especially those found
in the synoptic Gospels. This leads many to believe that Thomas
was also based on the so-called "Q" Document, along with Matthew,
Luke, and Mark. Indeed, some have speculated that Thomas may in
fact be "Q". Unlike the synoptic Gospels, and like "Q", the
Gospel of Thomas has no narrative connecting the various Sayings.
In form, it is simply a list of 114 Sayings, in no particular
order. Comparison with New Testament parallels show that Thomas
contains either more primitive versions of the Sayings, or
developments of more primitive versions. Either way, Thomas seems
to preserve earlier traditions about Jesus than the New
Testament.
http:// www.sacred-texts.com/chr/thomas.htm
Have fun anons…interesting read.
Anon is a survivor. Godspeed!
SailorAnons man the lookouts.
Caught that too. Must be fashionable. Not reading anything else into it.