unless I'm mis-reading this it seems Jeff Bezos is NSA (bought WaPo right after Snowden's drops to it) and Mark Zuckerberg is CIA. - This would also explain why Snowden retweeted this thing that makes Facebook look tame compared to Amazon. https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/1095011691451088896

also mention of the charter

www.austinlinks.com/Crypto/charter.html - I imagine the biggest problem the CIA would have from this charter is that there is a representative of the Army/Navy/Air Force - that presumably would get an inside look at CIA Intel.

>>5624765

yes… I think I'm right

>>5624915

because his name sounds like a famous clown. That honestly threw me for a while too but it's just too great a way to demean someone with that name - I mean what other options are there to mock a guy with a name one letter away from a clown name

anyway, i'm just stating my reading of the Qdrop - I thought it was all CIA but looking closer at the QMAP it's clear NSA is a major player as well with them being at a war with both each other and the military

>>5624993

well I thought he was CIA too but he bought WAPO which was hurting the NSA - which the CIA clearly wanted to do - if he's CIA that makes a lot less sense now

besides Q says nsa Vs CIA and MI vs CIA/NSA

>>5625026

that doesn't explain why Q would bring up WaPo being bought right after - no… given Snowden's tweets that seem easy on Facebook (CIA) and harsh on Amazon - I'm thinking I'm right on the money ;)

>>5625081

yea blinding the NSA so that U1 and Iran deal could happen actually does make sense - and another Q post seems to confirm it CIA. Tho there are a lot of variables stil