Anonymous ID: 662218 March 11, 2019, 2:30 p.m. No.5628011   🗄️.is 🔗kun

2018/02/07

 

"Barlow's overall politics shifted to a more standard Obama-supporting sense that big government was a necessary and important counterpoint to corporate power (and the kind of general attitude that, well, government is good when it does good things and bad when it does bad things), as he began discussing with me in his 2004 feature interview for Reason. Still, he remained on the side of the libertarian angels when it came to the debate over net neutrality, even as EFF was not.

 

Barlow knew he was trying to create a cultural myth with his declaration of independence, later saying "I knew it's also true that a good way to invent the future is to predict it. So I predicted Utopia, hoping to give Liberty a running start before the laws of Moore and Metcalfe delivered up what Ed Snowden now correctly calls 'turn-key totalitarianism.'"

 

While the question of exactly how libertarian the industries and industrialists of modern computer tech are, and how on balance its liberatory powers will overcome the surveillance powers of "turn-key totalitarianism" is still up in the air, Barlow's work in staking out the reasons to see what we used to call "cyberspace" and is now just where we all live all the time as properly a realm of total human liberation was a vital building block of the world we live in. (That thought leaders in the "cyber" world are rapidly running away from the idea that, for example, free expression in the world of the internet is a primary good is unfortunate and shows that no ideological battles for freedom are ever fully won.)"

 

https://reason.com/blog/2018/02/07/john-perry-barlow-the-thomas-jefferson-o

Anonymous ID: 662218 March 11, 2019, 2:37 p.m. No.5628156   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8318

>>5628026

Do politicians use fb?

Who else in powerful positions use fb?

Is fb safe?

What else is fb used for?

Does cia depend on fb now?

If mz exposed, what happens to all of it?

What does mz fear?