>>5632786 (pb)

>>5632792 (pb)

>>5632821 (pb)

Lotta ins, lotta outs, and what-have-yous? Chain of custody, and locker her up; got it. Much of this wouldn't be possible without people like Nate. So, how do we ensure their safety as whistleblowers? Let me come at this from another angle. Witness protection for mob bosses was a guarantee, and those people are scum. Nate is not scum. Nate is as much a patriot as another fella that had a boatload of emails to hand over.

I'm just doing the Spock eyebrow over here, that's all.

>>5632975

Almost forgot, TY Baker!!!

>>5633197

I didnt day they werent. Just wondering what we do to protect them.

>>5633199

>>5633221

>>5633273

Hence the Spock eyebrow. If the actual good guys are that expendable, then what's the point of even trying? Q's response reminds me of Tangina telling Carol Anne to run into the light. If I was Cain, I'd be asking for a detail and witness protection.

>>5633486

>>5633486

Wasnt it George Webb that caused the ruckus right after that drop re: Monday? I thought that drop was meant as a Q headfake so the leaker would expose themselves.

>>5633500

>>5633586

On a lighter note, I do wonder, sometimes, how many NSAnons have a "redheads" folder now.