Anonymous ID: 13db2d March 12, 2019, 4:02 a.m. No.5637826   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7895

>>5637731

A few years ago, I would suggest showing something like this to the left, so they could see how the most despised Republican leaders hated Trump, but all that would happen today is they would go out and buy Dick Cheney bobble-heads and posters.

Anonymous ID: 13db2d March 12, 2019, 4:16 a.m. No.5637872   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7882

>>5637844

"Breaking up" big companies has never been what people think…large corporations seeking monopoly and to shut out competition will quietly agitate for government regulation while pretending to be against it. The resulting government action will usually serve to establish and solidify a cartel made up of companies that are now forced to behave as the government (read: cabal) so wishes…it's a way to enforce terms of oligopoly, secure profits, and shut out competition…all the resulting companies that are splintered off from the original will still be controlled by the same deviants…for example, when Standard Oil was broken up we we're left with a permanent oil cartel still controlled by Rockefeller interests.

 

The cabal needs government protection because we are experiencing the beginning of people drifting away from social media…facebook, twitter, etc…they sense something on the horizon and the conditions will be ripe for new upstarts (read: non-CIA) to enter the market when the truth comes out. They would rather seek "reform" and try to assure people that "they don't do that bad stuff anymore" (a la MZ)…breaking them up actually helps them hold onto the market.

 

Long history of this…every major industry of the late 19th century sought cartelization in this manner…through government regulation.