Baker, regarding (lb) notables; additional digging re: Boeing patent & autopilot issues.
>>5639349 (lb)
>>5639529 (lb)
Months old breads have some info on auto-pilot and hacking. Here's related articles:
https://www.fox5vegas.com/news/airplane-hacking-explained-at-black-hat/article_59f95a52-8eb8-5527-b7a7-6f28af2c7dbd.html
>During his speech, he highlighted the main concerns his research presents, the first being airplanes. Santamarta said he got into an in-flight mid-air, and was able to get onto the Wi-Fi and people's phones and more.
"We accessed non-safety communication devices on board from the ground."
Santamarta said he's less concerned about the hacking of airplanes as he is what he discovered when it comes to our military, and maritime vessels. He said he can pinpoint the location of troops and potentially, military bases.
Anons, also look at Mil aircraft crashes. DS hackers targeting?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/could-terrorists-hack-an-airplane-the-government-just-did
>A Boeing spokesman told The Daily Beast: “We witnessed the test and can say unequivocally that there was no hack of the airplane’s flight control systems.”
Information about the extent of the test is restricted and there is a strong feeling among hacking experts that the full extent of the threat will remain underestimated—as they claim it has been for years.
The issue ignited after Robert Hickey, from the Cyber Security Division of the DHS, told a meeting of cyber experts in Virginia that his team had “accomplished a remote, non-cooperative penetration” of a Boeing 757, owned by the department, while it was parked at Atlantic City airport.