Anonymous ID: dbb57e March 12, 2019, 9:28 a.m. No.5640891   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0936 >>1461

>>5639580

>>5639594

>>5639637

>>5639655

>>5639713

>>5639807

>>5639902

>>5640080

>>5640636

 

Idk about money, but if the goal was actually to co-opt the antiestablishment tide swell and dilute it to the point of impotence and endless waiting for 'the messiah' to come and fix all the problems, I'd say it has been a glorious success.

 

I'm too old to put the probability of such happening, here, now, after all we know has been perpetrated, and after all these years of consolidation of power by the establishment. It's a single-digit possibility, even given the overt insinuation that it required a military-intel coup to pull it off. And then there are the many, glaring contradictions.

 

And since when do Americans assume mil-intel coups proffer good tidings?

 

Sounds and looks much more like a plot to sterilize the actual threats to elites - and that would be par for the course in this nation.

Anonymous ID: dbb57e March 12, 2019, 9:36 a.m. No.5641034   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1124

>>5640907

 

The odds are in your favor.

 

The way POTUS was cowed by the British to back off of declassification suggests this could be an SIS op (they built CIA, after all) to quiet the restless masses as they tighten the noose.

 

Too many sycophantic hypocrites ignoring all of the contradictions in this narrative.

Anonymous ID: dbb57e March 12, 2019, 9:42 a.m. No.5641124   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5641034

 

Theoretically, the entirety of this narrative, including the (SIS/)CIA actors who ginned up the 'Russia' angle, could be seen as accomplishing two goals at once.

 

To wit, engendering displaced ire towards Russia, the perennial target of establishment/elite interests, And creating a reflexive, ignorant counterculture that is desperate for a 'savior' - all the while compromising the antiestablishment constituencies that seemed prone to assert themselves.

 

Nothing about this bodes well for commoners.

Anonymous ID: dbb57e March 12, 2019, 10:01 a.m. No.5641476   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5641133

 

Please, folks. All of this 'Christian' iconography and quotation of 'scripture' is for weak minds.

 

Don't you realize that you're referencing a rather old, Egyptian cult? Nearly everything attributed to 'Jesus' was done by Horus, supposed 'son' of 'the dying god' (Osiris).

 

That Q quotes this trash without an ounce of honesty is more evidence that we're being led around by the nose.

 

Seriously, wtf, folks?