>>>>5641458 (pb)

Indictment rope-a-dope pacified DS, now they're trapped in their own web

>>5641544

>>5641458 (pb)

Notable late in pb

Anon Theory: Indictment rope-a-dope pacified DS, now they're trapped in their own web

>>5641604

Yes:

>>5641670

>>5641679

>Creepy Bidden kid picks have lost its shock value

Incorrect. Biden videos have not lost their purchase, rather, they've not been circulated widely enough.

OCR NEEDED! Is an Anon around who can run the Lisa Page testimony through Adobe (or similar)?

https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa%20Page%20interview%20Day%201.pdf

https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa%20Page%20interview%20Day%202.pdf

>>5641594

Lynch could never recuse herself to begin with. Only attorneys can make charging decisions, not FBI investigators (even if said investigators are attorneys). Lynch improperly and illegally abrogated her duty to make a charging decision to the FBI.

>>5641840

>>5641851

Correct, the language Lynch used was never recused, it was deferred or similar to that. Nonetheless, allowing the investigating agency to make "charging" decisions is NOT permitted.

>>5641862

Thank you!

>>5641893

It's not searchable. Performing OCR extraction makes it searchable.

>>5641920

Lynch could have recused herself (and should have). However, she would have had to replace herself with another attorney within DOJ to make charging decisions (or head the team of DOJ prosecutors to review the FBI investigation for charging decisions).

Instead, she said she'd defer to the FBI on their "decision" to charge, which she literally could not do (unless you're a swamp creature).

Am I making sense?

>>5642041

Crud! I tried some free sites, but the file sizes were too big. I was hoping an Anon was around with Adobe Pro.

>>5642125

TY!

Rare Pepe for you :)

>>5642177

It's ok, now that it's searchable, it's a better research tool. Appreciated!