>>5641461

Do you sincerely believe a post with a veiled reference to Charles somehow implies this administration is at odds with those elites, or is it just fodder for the desperate?

If POTUS was nearly removed by a CIA plot that has SIS prints all over it, would he cover that up (after publicly promising to divulge it in full)?

If he actually believes in the right of a people to choose their own representatives, would he attempt to install a crony of the establishment in Venezuela, in contravention of the election there?

If the 25th Amendment was attempted to be used to oust POTUS, and Q calls that "treason", then what is Guaido's installation supposed to impart? Looks an awful lot the same as if a Pelosi was installed here with UK support, doesn't it?

We should assume this is smoke and mirrors, intended to placate the masses from pursuing something akin to the yellow vest movement in France.

Seriously, when did everyone lose their grasp on reality?

>>5641765

Excuse me, anon. Is "the left" the issue, or is that 'divisiveness' I see fostered and encouraged on this board daily?

Is it commoners versus elites, or the false 'left'/'right' paradigm (created by elites) being played out, over and over, ad infinitum?

I fail to see how your comment implies you grasp the gravity of the situation.

>>5641811

Bingo.

All of that is being quietly brushed under the rug as these people rant about their proxies in CIA/DOJ/FBI, and relate it to 44 and 'the left'.

News flash, folks: this is a colony. Yes, it's a colony with massive investments from the elites in the establishment, but a colony, nonetheless.

Q must think we're too immature to handle truth, so he layers on the US angle of 'the deep state' narrative, all the while neglecting to point out the obvious.

That, or it's the entire point of this ruse.

>>5641853

That you can't recognize what you're doing is not surprising.

You fell right into the same trap elites always set for commoners:

Get them to point fingers at themselves, while elites make off with the funds, and continue with their plots.

Do you think removing a few pawns-of-pawns of elite interests is going to 'free' this nation from the yoke around its neck?

That's a dream, and an unrealistically hopeful, and desperate, one.

>>5641949

Yes, anon. The US is a colony, and always has been.

'Civis Romanus sum'.

>>5641743

You're not alone, anon.

>>5641888

The 'eternal war' indoctrination worked rather well on this one, a testament to elitist propaganda. Who's at war with elites? Very few, as far as I can tell. Lots of folks sitting, waiting patiently, as they lap up their preferred flavor of propaganda, though, all the while content to watch it like some kind of show. I'm sure the elite are trembling.

>>5642059

Ah, so we can easily discern you're proclivity to uncritically consume propaganda. That's nice.

Who bought up all of the assets after that 'conflict'? And how much consolidation of that ownership followed, relatively unobstructed?

It's a shame that people don't realize all those 'free market' proponents they pretend were 'enlightened' were actually East India Company scribes. Smith? Hume? The Mills?

Go get yourself an education before you ignorantly spew your mythical origin stories all over the boards, anon.

>>5642151

Perhaps Barr is trusted by Mueller, but should he be trusted by Americans?

How many Bushites have to be installed before it's no longer "coincidence"? I suppose that's why Abrams got a nod, too, right?

Because every 'patriot' picks cronies of their enemies to do the heavy lifting, especially those with proven track records of covering for criminals.

Sure.

>>5642247

Herd-like groupthink by people claiming to "think for themselves."

Only marginally unsettling, no?

>>5642227

Nice logic.

You seem to think good intentions somehow negate the fact that those persons were unwitting dupes.

Sure, freedom from the Empire is a noble cause. Failure to comprehend one's failure is not so noteworthy.

Of course, you knew "free markets" was a British ploy originated from the hallowed halls of EIC propaganda mills to open foreign markets to the outsize influence of ultra-Capitalists.

You just conflated their interests with your own. Don't hate. Just learn your history, anon.