My twitter is blowing up with the Lisa Page testimony and how she specifically says Obama was in on it.

But that will not be enough proof.

It is still possible that Obama was lied to by the agencies about the reason to look into the Trump campaign.

I mean anons know this to not be the case, but you need to provide evidence in the court of law. My question is what evidence is there outside of some testimony/text messages?

>>5645042

>>5645074

I am not saying I disagree with you anon, but don't the Presidential Daily Briefs just state what was told to Obama from the agencies?

In other words, it could be made to look like the agencies suggested the spying and not Obama.

I think there needs to be a bigger smoking gun. I am assuming Q has it, but not sure what it is.