I think this Anon

>>5647067 (pb)

has the catch on the 12 YT lines Q+ posted.

(But there could be other valid meanings too.)

The 12 links match the delta on the two part tweet that concludes with the line about quickly taking control of the plane.

7:12-7:00=12

The linked video that Q always reposts says this is "NOT simply another four year election".

Why? It is the FLIGHT 93 ELECTION.

We are all ABOUT to be called upon to QUICKLY TAKE CONTROL OF A PLANE, the plane being America.

When POTUS gives the signal, we will all TELL THE TRUTH about Q, each acting as seems best. Think on your own and act.

We will deal the FAKE NEWS a deadly blow.

MOAR in comments

>>5651749

Since 14 Feb 19, when DJT tweeted an overt reference to "Flight 93 Election" author Michael Anton, ALL Q+ posts have appeared on days with DJT tweets that include a likely reference to "Flight 93".

17 Feb : two Q+, one "93" tweet

24 Feb : one Q+, one "93" tweet

12 Mar : one Q+, "quickly take control of a plane" tweet

See comment for the rest of the graphics.

>>5651775

MOAR graphics for prior

MOAR evidence and reasoning:

>>5568068 (pb)

>>5651813

I haven't seen that. I'll make a note. I have read various revisionist views on 9/11, including some by Ron Unz of unz.com I found much of what he said at least plausible.

But none of this actually matters at the moment, since DJT has clearly embraced the imagery that Anton put forth. It doesn't matter if it is ultimately mythical.

>>5651795

I literally think he is going to tweet the "Let's Roll!" meme above, for reasons I explain in multiple posts linked here:

>>5568068 (pb)

>>5651988

I'll look it up.

This is the most interesting 9/11 revisionism I've seen:

http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-911-conspiracy-theories/

More of an overview, but quite interesting.

>>5651749

Anons, whenever I post anything on this theme, the most persistent sort of feedback I get involves the idea that "Flight 93" or all of 9/11 didn't happen as the official story tells it.

BUT IT DOESN'T MATTER.

I mean, it doesn't matter as far as Q is concerned. Michael Anton used the imagery, and it worked on behalf of Trump, and now I think they are jointly using it in the Q op.

Yes, the truth about 9/11 DOES matter, but imagery can work even if it is loosely connected to hard facts.