Anonymous ID: b59335 March 12, 2019, 8 p.m. No.5652081   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2136

>>5651961

https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/11/07/matt-whitaker-cant-prevent-mueller-from-unsealing-any-sealed-indictments/

 

I've been trying to figure out who actually has the authority to remove an indictment… And I don't think Whitaker has the authority to remove an indictment.

Anonymous ID: b59335 March 12, 2019, 8:16 p.m. No.5652354   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5652136

Then the last part of Q's statement is what makes me think about a few things. "… Without reason" and the confirmation ratio.

There would be no need to drive this home if the indictment of Ivanka and Jared was removed.

 

How did FBI informants who could be used for FISA warrants end up in Trump's campaign? This question has bothered me for some time.

Why would they target RR with that wire story? The story itself makes no sense, we all know POTUS is a stable genius. He isn't ranting and raving in his meetings with people. The story only makes sense as a publicity ploy and a stunt to try and get POTUS to fire RR, which would have redirected control over Mueller.

 

If Whitaker did file indictments of Jared and Ivanka, then Q's point is that the Democrats do not want either of them indicted and wanted them protected.

"POTUS is completely isolated."

"Imagine the confusion if we weren't here."

 

"These people are stupid."

  • their entire plan revolved around investigating foreign involvement of people in his campaign … Which would ultimately empanel an investigation that would find the ties to the democrat's foreign teams of collusion.

Mueller's investigation will ultimately indict the people responsible for placing the "Russian Operatives" in his campaign.