Anonymous ID: edd90c March 13, 2019, 5:48 a.m. No.5657903   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7920 >>7982 >>8025 >>8259

>>5657786 (lb)

If you kill someone, you don't need intent.

You killed them and are charged with murder.

Intent is nothing more than evidence that shows the reason you done it and nothing more.

It's evidence that shows the reason you done it and nothing more.

Anonymous ID: edd90c March 13, 2019, 5:55 a.m. No.5657958   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8195 >>8527

Now you have to ask yourself, why does an Afghan official care about 9/11?

=NEWS=

US-Taliban peace deal would dishonor 9/11 victims, senior Afghan official warns

https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-taliban-peace-deal-would-dishonor-9-11-victims-and-troops-who-lost-lives-senior-afghan-official-warns

Anonymous ID: edd90c March 13, 2019, 6:11 a.m. No.5658066   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8180

>>5657982

'a magistrate must see intent to forward charges'….

That is not a crime of itself though.

The magistrate is looking at evidence to prove there was a motive in order to proceed.

Ideals are not actionable crimes, that's like saying jokingly your going to rob a particular bank…it gets robbed by chance…they come after YOU for having that thought.

Intent is a bullshit charge for motive, which is all nothing but evidence.

But court systems have made intent actionable crimes for the sole purpose of gaining revenue.

Anonymous ID: edd90c March 13, 2019, 6:51 a.m. No.5658448   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8471

=NEWS=

TUCKER CARLSON: Soros-funded creeps come after Fox, and you're next

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-were-becoming-an-authoritarian-society-and-the-group-in-charge-is-coming-after-fox-news