I find it hard to take this at face value. The picture on here the last couple of days legitimately did not look like Melania. The pictures of Hillary that show up on here from time to time do not look like her. Not having been in Alabama with Trump, how would anyone on here know if Melania was there with him or if the picture was faked? (And no, I did not spend time questioning whether Melania was in AL, or pushing that it was a body double, just saw what was going on here and reasonably questioned the picture in my mind.)
This is the Achilles heel of places like this. Yes there are anons who should have found the picture was photoshoped if it was, because that is what they do. But this place does nothing but aggregate information from other sources, much of which is from places Anons don't trust. Q tells people to think for themselves, but the average person does not have unlimited time to track down source documentation to find out the truth about all the situations that face us in the world. A source may be reliable on one subject and completely twist another. Every news outlet spends time twisting the narrative on one issue or another. None the less, you will loose your proverbial head around here if don't back up an assertion with sauce from one of these 'fake media' outlets. Independent journalist who try to find alternative platforms get chewed up and spit out by places like this because they all are 'obviously' comped given they make mistakes or buy into some narrative. And yet the echo chamber of this and other social media platforms is very apparent to anyone who tries to take an objective look at what is going on.
Maybe the lesson is that there really is no objectivity in the world, only narratives told by different groups.