>>5654980

How did HRC get access to SAP / SCI programs on her personal server?

Well.. given that BHO was also using that email addy, he would have had to acknowledge or approve it. USSS would have checked on his phones and approved that comm line just like Trump and Twatter.

SAP / SCI control is under the ODNI.. Clapper would have had to authorize or approve the security of her server if it was properly authorized.

Further, the SAP program itself would have had to approve her access and how information was to be accessed / transmitted / stored (eg, outside of a SCIF).

Temporary SCIFs can be set up, but expire or must be re-authorized by ODNI. Permanent SCIFs even have to go through periodic checks. There would be records of her server, her house, her bathroom server location being reviewed and approved IF it was legit.

Follow the logic? Comey would have had no problem exhonerating her IF such review documents existed and more than just Comey would know about it.. the fact that they even had to look through the emails to detect classified info tells you there was no such certification of her server or location as a SCIF.

Therefore, even 1 email that should have been marked SCIF / SAP under info classification scheme would place her in jail for violating several laws because she never ever did have such approval to have a SCIF.

I will post more info in a minute about this.

>>5660276

>IDEN OF 'SPECIFIC' SAP/SCI ON THE SERVER PROVIDES A TARGET (ROADMAP) TO REVIEW ACCESS LOGS TO THAT SPECIFIC PROGRAM?

Yes; the access and the transfer is logged and very very clearly communicated to ODNi when info is moved outside of a SCIF.

>WHAT PROCESS AND/OR SEC CLEARANCE WOULD BE REQ TO WALK-AWAY [TERMINAL_CLEAR] W/ SAP/SCI MATERIAL 'ELECTRONICALLY'?

“I was never here.. you never saw me… this never happened.” - James Earl Jones, Hunt for Red October.

There is no real way to just “walk away” with data outside of a SCIF unless it has been declassified by the President or SAP or other process; or if the ORCAN / SAP approved release, normally well documented, including the method of transfer and the specific identify of the material, and who… freaking documented out the ass basically. And ODNI would be advised and aware. Again, none of this appears to be the case.. she guilty.

>>5660606

What is a roadmap?

If you are the FBI investigator and you come across a document that is marked under info classification scheme with a SAP named clearance, what do you do? Are you allowed to look at it?

No. It creates a problem for FBI or NYPD investigators. Anthony Weiners laptop is a good example here.

So when the search warrant is written, the SAC or whoever writes it up in such a way to deal with such eventualities. Who wrote the warrants? Strzok? Others? Could they be written in such a way to exclude agents or law enforcement from even looking at or touching SAP material (eyes only)?

Why did 911 commission recommend closer cooperation between clowns and Feebs? “Virtually integrated at every level” - Rober Mueller.

Why did Abel Danger pose a problem? No one authorized to know about SAP or receive info without whose approval? Can’t even tell them you exist? Rockefeller created compartmentalized secrecy approach because why? Help post WW2? Or hurt post WW2? Only one group has it all.. and that is the group that sits on top of all secrecy and doesn’t give a damn about laws.. the global cabal… run by the Marduk/Moloch serving bloodlines and their idiot wannabees.

Why do we have secrets? Because (((they))) want us to have them.