Anonymous ID: 8a40d6 March 13, 2019, 2:50 p.m. No.5665877   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5665653

>>5664863

>>5654980

 

Reply to Q 03/13/19 (Wed) No.5654980

The Tarmac Meeting.

 

Days Later….

[JC] "No charges are appropriate……….."

HOW DID HRC OBTAIN SAP (SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS) ON HER PERSONAL SERVER(S)?

ACCESS TO SAP/SCI IS RECORDED IN A LOCAL ACCESS REGISTER OR IN A COMPUTER DATABASE —- WHERE ARE THE RECORDS?

 

WHAT PROCESS AND/OR SEC CLEARANCE WOULD BE REQ TO WALK-AWAY [TERMINAL_CLEAR] W/ SAP/SCI MATERIAL 'ELECTRONICALLY'?

Did a Foreign State gain access to the server?

Did a Foreign State gain access to the SAP/SCI material on the server?

DOES ONE CONCLUDE THE INVESTIGATION WAS NOT CONDUCTED PROPERLY?

DOES ONE CONCLUDE ALL STATEMENTS MADE BY THE FBI (THINK NO HACK OF SERVER AS SINGLE EXAMPLE) COULD BE FALSE?

 

Note the Dates - This was out there, but not if you only followed FlakeNewsits.

 

From a July, 2016, AskMeAnything - FBI Anon

  • I am posting from a position of near anonymity and enough plausible deniability to evade prosecution, as we have all been given gag orders. There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down. There already is enough to indict. Comey has been trying to stall because he does not want to face the Clinton Machine, as well as the rest of Washington D.C.

SAPs – All I can tell you about the SAPs is HRC had them, and she did not have proper authority to have any of them. They were leaked to her by someone, and she did sell them to overseas donors. Possessing them alone makes her guilty of treason. Sec. [of State] CAN have access. That does not mean he/she WILL. SAP is granted on a need to know basis, and HRC did not have any need to know any of the programs on her server.

The Clinton Foundation (CF) – The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server. BC likely wanted LL to focus on the e-mail server and shy away from prosecuting the foundation. [The Foundation]

 

Q - Is it true 'Cabinet Level' aircraft have Audio/Video recorders in the cabin & recordings get copied to a remote site?

 

On Date November 2, 2016 - Fox's Bret Baier reports the latest news about the Clinton Foundation investigation from two sources inside the FBI.

  1. Sources within the FBI have told Baier that an indictment is "likely" in the case of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, "barring some obstruction in some way" from the Justice Department.

  2. FBI sources say with 99% accuracy that Hillary Clinton's server has been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that information have been taken from it.

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html

 

http://nypost.com/2016/01/31/this-was-all-planned-former-ig-says-hillary-state-dept-are-lying/

Howard J. Krongard, DOJ inspector general from 2005 to 2008. He says “the key” to the FBI’s investigation of Emailgate is determining how highly sensitive state secrets in the classified network, known as SIPRNet, ended up in Clinton’s personal emails. “The starting point of the investigation is the material going through SIPRNet. She couldn’t function without the information coming over SIPRNet,” Krongard said. “How did she get it on her home server? It can’t just jump from one system to the other. Someone had to move it, copy it. The question is who did that?”

 

The KEY FIRST THING to INVESTIGATE Never happened until the Weiner laptop & everyone reading Draft Emails turned up.

 

June 22, 2016 - The compromise of the foundation’s computers was first identified by government investigators as recently as last week, the people familiar with the matter said. Agents monitor servers used by hackers to communicate with their targets, giving them a back channel view of attacks, often even before the victims detect them. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-22/clinton-foundation-said-to-be-breached-by-russian-hackers

 

What do 64.94.172.146 and 24.187.234.187 have in common? Both were concurrent IP addresses of the Clinton Crime Foundation and Crooked SoS.

 

The fact that both of these email servers have the same IP address means that they were operating on the same network, and sharing physical space. It is also possible that they were operating on different machines on the same network, which still means that the machines would have to be close enough to exist in the same physical location.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/31/exclusive-hillary-shared-an-email-network-with-the-clinton-foundation/

 

So the BHCC Foundation is hacked, but the same addressed IP Crooked Server was not?