>>5664402 (pb)
I'm sorry, guys, but this doesn't leave me alone.
So if we look at the aircraft market we have 2 big players in the world - Boeing and Airbus.
The economic backbone of Boeing is the B737, the economic backbone of Airbus is the A320.
These two aircraft types are existentially important for both companies.
Without 737 Boeing would be broke, without 320 Airbus would be broke.
If we now look at China, we see the Comac C919, which is located in the same area as the B737 and the A320.
But how will Comac manage to compete with the 2 super heavyweights Boeing and Airbus?
How can they squeeze their new aircraft into the market?
It would be quite practical, even if quite ill, if one or the other Boeing or perhaps Airbus aircraft were to crash.
That would raise doubts in the market and make it easier for Comac or anyone else (Russia, Irkut MC21???) to enter the market.
Especially in emerging markets.
Where did the 737 crash?
In Ethiopia and Indonesia!
I now believe that the 737 has been deliberately prepared (only a safety feature for MCAS sensors, no redundancy, as usual) and should actually facilitate Comac's market entry.
But now they are in a panic and need FF and countermoves to Q and Trump.
That's why they prefer the whole thing and try to get ahead again in 3D chess.
We must not forget that Airbus, but many more Boeing, are very important defense-companies.
If you weaken these economically very much, then you weaken the armament.
If we assume that we live in times of war, then both Boeing and Airbus would certainly be preferred targets.
Moves and countermoves.
The attacks will only intensify.