Anonymous ID: ffaa2b March 13, 2019, 3:34 p.m. No.5666510   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6562

>>5666365 lb

It's a complicated legal battle that only the SC can decide. Of course the country does not want their documents in the hands of a grand jury.

 

I personally can't wait to find out what company and what country. I also know Mueller is investigating ties with Israel. 2 ongoing grand jury investigations that I know of with Mueller. That's why I don't see him ending any time soon. In spite of what we have been told.

 

>>5666402 lb

You think he lives in a vacuum? He tweets all the time. He has many followers. You think he has never heard of QAnon? You think not a single person that tweeted him today did not even mention "anon"? c'mon.

Anonymous ID: ffaa2b March 13, 2019, 3:45 p.m. No.5666682   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5666381

Which was why Jordan and Meadows are asking for all info regarding which 2016 candidates got any intelligence briefings. Not a big deal really. Just moar proof of the bias.

Anonymous ID: ffaa2b March 13, 2019, 3:50 p.m. No.5666779   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5666605

I feel ya.They usually appear very early in the bread so easy to filter then get comfy. I get more irritated with the so obvious slides and anons falling for it.

Anonymous ID: ffaa2b March 13, 2019, 3:55 p.m. No.5666865   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6953

>>5666562

hahaha…now that is the true question. Logically, if someone did hack it, they would have typed moar than just Q, unless it was Q.

But I still push back on the assumption of his use of anon as proof he is a follower. A much better argument can be made.

Anonymous ID: ffaa2b March 13, 2019, 4:04 p.m. No.5667022   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7057 >>7059 >>7072 >>7109

>>5666978

When Q said we would get some difficult to handle news, it just now occurs to me that he could be talking about Assange, for one. I hadn't gone down that rabbit hole yet, but I believe JPB, Snowden and Assange are cut from the same cloth.