>>5667136 lb lb lb

>>5666916 lb lb

reply to libtard comment on lawfag notable

Your point anon?

penalties for false answers to stiff enuf?

does not change the analysis at all

presents enforcement issue that can be addressed

saying it cant be enforced and therefore we should allow OUR vote to be diluted is a LIBTARD argument

>>5667230

>Attack the argument instead of the one making the argument.

yup and this has been done

and once that is done then attack the shill

cuz now its just lies and nonsense and does not deserve further substantive rebuttal

>>5667404

have sum

>>5667509

well of course it does dilute but there really is no need to go there cuz its illegal for them to vote as it is

enforcement is a problem cuz of corruption

>>5667638

if you simply posted bad people and explained why they are bad that mmight be effective

and if perchance the peeps in the ics were all jewish then others just might decide for themselves that is a relevant factor

but labeling them as you do just demonstrates that you are a stoopid nigger