Anonymous ID: f0a41b March 13, 2019, 5:52 p.m. No.5668846   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5668728

I've said the same thing,yet Trump has flown one time,and no evidence exists that he went to the island that i am aware of. We will never know all the facts,however, had you been invited to the island and saw what goes on there,would you go back? It seems that Trump had a look,maybe,and didn't like what he saw.

This is only theory.

Clinton however has been 26 times?

That is indicative of a pattern of guilt? Behavior? Complicity? You make the call.

I have no idea what Trump has done,which we couldn't possibly know with the facts that are available.

Anonymous ID: f0a41b March 13, 2019, 5:59 p.m. No.5669000   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9436

>>5668821

  1. Snopes is not a credible source. Never use that shit here again.

  2. Any possible theories that include the word possibly are immediately thrown out as bunk guesses,especially since the case had majir discrepancies and was tossed by a judge before being retracted by "the victim ".

Again, never use snopes.

This is also not a defense of Trump.

He may indeed have been/ is a underage predator.

I have no idea. Is it likely?

You'd have to show me more evidence.

One case of maybe,possibly, and off hand remarks are not enough.

Anonymous ID: f0a41b March 13, 2019, 6:08 p.m. No.5669170   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5669039

You fucktards are always the same. You used snopes,admitted that they used facts,but didn't come to a conclusion, then you came to a conclusion. Many conclusions.

1 conclusion was that Trump is a perv child molester.

I said he could be. That it is possible.

2 Your 2nd bullshit claim is that i dont care about children, and if you said that to my face i would rip your head off,shove it up your ass,and shit down your neck.

But you keep posting muh snopes shit.

You don't realize that they came to no conclusions because there was not enough evidence and they would have been sued into oblivion. They make you want to come to the conclusion that you came to.

You are an idiot sheep.