>>5668482 (lb)

The DOJ declined prosecuting Hillary (or hiLARRY, as I call the fucking lesbo bitch) for the reason that the gross negligence statute had only been applied to military cases where classified information was lost.

As a lawanon, I can unequivocally say that is the BIGGEST PILE OF BULLSHIT EXCUSE to ever be applied to such a situation.

It wasn't gross negligence. At least, it was a willful and wanton disregard of security procedures.

But we all know it was moar than that.

>>5668799

Poasted this last bread but it didn't get traction.

Shitty job, but I'm not working with anything fancy. Would love to see someone with photoshop take this and run with it.

Zuck Fark Muckerberg

>>5668902

Concur with your analysis.

>>5668940

France is doing the analysis of the black box info…the same France that makes Airbus, Boeing's biggest competitor.

No conflict of interest here…

>>5668957

Even her name sounds like a regurgitative event…

>>5669031

Didja ever notice that she looks just like the Kavanaugh psycho-slut, too?

>>5669114

Understatement of the hour. You get a cookie (just be sure to wipe your browser history!) KEK

>>5669186

Now now … we can't make fun of a mentally-challenged tart with a little-girly voice. KEK

>>5669251

>>5669251

BTW, anons here have been saying, "Only the President can authorize…" or "Only the SecArmy, SecNav, etc., can authorize…"

Horseshit. THE ORIGINATING AUTHORITY THAT CONTROLS THE INTELLIGENCE CAN AUTHORIZE. That is how classification works.

Bigger question is -

Who "owned" the SCIF that the information was "stolen" from?

Sorry, Grammar Nazi - Who owned the SCIF from which the information was stolen?