>>567212

To be a bombshell, it would have to be very obvious in the video who she was talking about.

>>567222

>the new church. the unified church. catholics + protestants. Apostolic Christianity.

I've been thinking about this as well: Q has suggested that the papacy has been compromised. If so, how long has it been compromised? And either way, if this were exposed what would happen to Christianity? We could see the birth of an all-new faith.

>>567354

>RAW refers to format

Isn't it an actual picture format used by professional digital cameras?

>>567408

Thank you for your continued hope and direction, Q

>>567502

>These peo>>567493

>ple are stupid.

Q keeps saying this. I don't think it's just gloating.

>>567521

>>567542

Hmm… so will all of the BOOMs be tweeted by POTUS?

>>567637

Imagine if Google, Facebook, Twitter relented on their censorship altogether. Spreading the truth would INCREDIBLY simple.

>>567712

It would have to be something very, very blunt and obvious to send the right shock waves.

>>567803

Q, you have stated before that we are more powerful than we know and are making a major impact. How can you measure that? How can estimate the spread and effect?