>>5674068 (LB)
I think you're correct that Q does not need us for research (although I'm sure the Q team has learned a thing or two from this palce), but Q needed us to do the research so we would believe it for ourselves. Anons are filling in the blanks.
seconded
Since this audience has grown so large now, with even the players paying attention, Q's posts now are provoking actors into action. Much to the amusement of anons. Sit back and enjoy the show, it's glorious.
wonder if we can get codemonkey, or another anon here to automate this. Seems like an awful lot of work for humans to do several times a day.
Sure, we are the curators. And notables could be picked up by the automated baker program. The machine is good at doing the same thing repeatedly, which is 90% of the bake process.
Jeez that's kinda harsh language all for a guy asking a couple questions.
Tone it down, this is a place for distinguished gentlemen.
Heck buddy, cool it with the language. This is a safe language space here.
Found it boys. Real news right herr.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/janet-yellen-and-barack-obamas-economy-is-looking_us_5a1d34bae4b09413e786aec5