to the shill discussing taking a pen at the office:

deal with your own concept of accountability without trying to guilt everyone else.

'collective guilt'?

is that another lie of Socialism?

some are possessed of demons.

in that sense ONLY THE DEMONS are guilty.

it's best for you to look at yourself and stop with your 'we are all one. I am a sinner. you are as evil as me' bit.

It's tireing and shows you to be a manipulator.

your philosophy is garbage.

the one you post to talks about serious abuses of liberty. You talk about 'pens' in the office. by the way, pens are usually not accounted after being distributed. If you 'take it home' it's not stealing then, is it? It's expected that will happen.

you try to equate serious abuses of human liberty to the way that pens are accounted for in an office environment?

you should not be even discussing morality.

>>5675865

which is why I pointed it out.

>>5675865

you need a 'jump the shark' image.

I see your post as a bot post trying to make it seem as though it was my idea to make the equation about pens.

You know that on these boards there is no smear, even though shills love to tag you.

you understand that I review other people's posts, correct?

I don't like to link to the posts that I review because that pays them.

I understand how you work, and you should know that these smear tactics are absolutely worthless here. This board is like a graffitti wall.

one post is one post. it only is about the anon who is the poster, never about the whole board. Or the anon who respond.

anyone else seeing a very marked difference in the speed of the board today?

that is a metric.

all of these 'shutdowns' and 'reboots' must be having some effect.

maybe the shillbots were distributed accross everyone's phones and now that it's been reset the bots have no processor power left?

Facebook, et all, ought to pay us all back for the power consumed to host their spy network.

>>5675865

so my conclusion that you are a smear bot seems correct, unless you correct me.

I review. I don't come up with rediculous connections.

you set up rediculous cnnections and then try to connect anon to them.

is this a correct view of your role her as a bot?

>>5676363

weren't black holes proven to be a farce?

the blackness is only along the equator of them?

from the poles they spew large streams of Gamma radiation?

so they aren't really black, we are just looking at them sideways?

and yet even though this is a much more plausible explanation, we still persist with this fiction of 'black hole'.

>>5675865

smear bot, good bye.