Anonymous ID: 49251e March 14, 2019, 6:35 a.m. No.5676674   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Brexit bog: ‘No delay from EU – or we elect 73 Nigel Farages into European Parliament’

 

The UK Parliament is set to seek postponement of Brexit, but Brussels may be reluctant to grant it. One argument against may be a potential poison pill in the form of Eurosceptic MEPs, voted in by offended Britons in May.

The dramatic week of Brexit votes in the UK Parliament draws to a conclusion on Thursday. Earlier, MPs rejected both the deal negotiated with the EU by Prime Minister Theresa May’s cabinet, and the option to leave the EU with no deal at all, which the government asked to leave on the table to keep pressure on Brussels. MPs are now set to vote on whether London should ask for a delay in exiting the union.

While a disorderly Brexit would hurt the EU, several top European officials warned that no delay would be granted unless Britain comes up with a clear and substantial plan, which it would try to achieve if given more time. But European bureaucrats may have more reasons not to tolerate Britain dragging its feet, MEP from Scotland David Coburn told RT.

 

"If we end up staying beyond a certain period, we have to take part in the European elections. Then what you are going to see is 73 Nigel Farages returned to the European Parliament. It would make the government of the EU impossible. They would probably want to throw us out, I should think."

 

The next European election is scheduled for the end of May. The UK’s share of the seats would be 73 if it remained part of the EU – with both Britain and the EU making contingencies for this scenario. Nigel Farage, the former leader of the UK Independence Party, is still technically an independent MEP, as is David Coburn, even though they belong to the newly-formed Eurosceptic Brexit Party.

 

https://www.rt.com/uk/453785-brexit-european-parliament-election/

Anonymous ID: 49251e March 14, 2019, 6:46 a.m. No.5676765   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6881 >>6943 >>7019 >>7109

READ: The transcribed interview of Peter Strzok by the Committee on the Judiciary, joint with the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

 

https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/06.27.18%20Interview%20Of%20Peter%20Strzok.pdf

Anonymous ID: 49251e March 14, 2019, 6:58 a.m. No.5676881   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6943 >>7019 >>7109

>>5676765

Peter Strzok transcript released

 

A transcript from former FBI agent Peter Strzok’s prviate June 2018 testimony before a joint congressional task force were released by the top House Judiciary Committee Republican on Thursday.

 

Strzok, a lead investigator in the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's unauthorized private email server, appeared before the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees as part of their investigation into potental bias in the Justice Department and FBI.

 

“As I have said before, I believe the American people deserve transparency, and deserve to know what transpired in the highest echelons of the FBI during that tumultuous time for the bureau,” House Judiciary Committee ranking member Doug Collins, R-Ga., said as he announced the release of the Strzok transcript.

 

Blow for Mueller as Paul Manafort gets under four years in prison

Watch Full Screen to Skip Ads

The private testimony with Strzok took place weeks before he appeared in a dramatic public hearing in July 2018.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/peter-strzok-transcript-released

Anonymous ID: 49251e March 14, 2019, 7:07 a.m. No.5676968   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7002

Eight elite schools hit with first lawsuit in massive college admissions bribery scam

 

The massive college admissions scam that snared 50 people in a federal indictment, including two high-profile actresses, has prompted a class-action lawsuit filed by two California college students.

 

This is a breaking news story. Please check back for updates.

 

http://kwbe.com/abc_national/eight-elite-schools-hit-with-first-lawsuit-in-massive-college-admissions-bribery-scam-abcid36166492/

Anonymous ID: 49251e March 14, 2019, 7:11 a.m. No.5677002   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5676968

College admissions scandal: Stanford students file lawsuit against USC, Yale, UCLA, others

 

SAN FRANCISCO (KRON) - Two Stanford University students are suing several universities and seeking class status amid the college admissions cheating and bribery scandals.

Erica Olson and Kalea Woods are suing the University of Southern California, Yale University, the University of California Los Angeles, and other elite colleges, saying they were denied a fair opportunity to gain legitimate admission and that their Stanford degrees were devalued, according to Bloomberg.

The case – Olsen v. Singer – filed Wednesday, says the students claimed they were denied a fair opportunity to apply to admission at Yale and USC.

As a result of the alleged fraudulent bribery schemes, “unqualified students found their way into the admissions rolls of highly selective universities, while those students who played by the rules and did not have college-bribing parents were denied admission,” the complaint states.

Federal prosecutors say 50 people took part in a scheme that involved either cheating on standardized tests or bribing college coaches and school officials to accept students as college athletes – even if the student had never played that sport.

Of those 50 people, 13 are Bay Area parents.

 

https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/college-admissions-scandal-stanford-students-file-lawsuit-against-usc-yale-ucla-others/1848456827

Anonymous ID: 49251e March 14, 2019, 7:20 a.m. No.5677071   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7117

>>5677052

 

The Bayh–Dole Act or Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act (Pub. L. 96-517, December 12, 1980) is United States legislation dealing with intellectual property arising from federal government-funded research. Sponsored by two senators, Birch Bayh of Indiana and Bob Dole of Kansas, the Act was adopted in 1980, is codified at 94 Stat. 3015, and in 35 U.S.C. § 200–212,[1] and is implemented by 37 C.F.R. 401.[2]

 

The key change made by Bayh–Dole was in ownership of inventions made with federal funding. Before the Bayh–Dole Act, federal research funding contracts and grants obligated inventors (wherever they worked) to assign inventions they made using federal funding to the federal government.[3] Bayh–Dole permits a university, small business, or non-profit institution to elect to pursue ownership of an invention in preference to the government.[4]

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayh%E2%80%93Dole_Act