Anonymous ID: 7aec94 March 14, 2019, 11:20 a.m. No.5680264   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0274

What is the "NPC meme"

Is it organic?

Are things that "go viral" IN A SUDDEN FRENZY OF "ANON" ACTIVITY organic?

Use logic.

Does the "NPC meme" divide the people?

Does it blame the people?

Does it dehumanize the people?

It won't wake them.

It DOESN'T expose corruption.

Rather than saying "expose corruption", the NPC meme says "fight among yourselves"…

Yet it is OUR meme?

Because "anons" post it here?

Then what the fuck are "anons"?

 

WAKE UP HUMANS

Anonymous ID: 7aec94 March 14, 2019, 11:21 a.m. No.5680274   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0295 >>0334 >>0747

>>5680264

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How would we know?

Does anyone ask?

Or just assume someone else did?

Will it get removed?

Does its origins and validity get addressed?

What controls the board and decides?

Are the people in control of this board?

How do you know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Anonymous ID: 7aec94 March 14, 2019, 11:21 a.m. No.5680277   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0286

What is this video supposed to be? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative

ONTO patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is

the MSM narrative, and that is what this video

reinforces, strongly. Why?

BEWARE. FAKENESS IS EVERYWHERE

"Chan culture" has been co-opted by fakeness and is now being FORCED.

Wake up patriots!

https://youtu.be/GClSLT18S5Y

Anonymous ID: 7aec94 March 14, 2019, 11:21 a.m. No.5680286   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0291

>>5680277

Look at these.

What do they convey?

Are we being MOCKED, here?

Really, are you kidding me?

Look.

Comey and Obama smirking?

Big black holes in the head?

Distorted weird faces?

Bad facial expressions?

Cattle herding?

Where do these images come from?

Who/what is mocking us?

It is not Q, who is mocked too…

 

Why doesn't the COMMUNITY create the images?

It doesn't

Where do they come from?

 

[INTERNAL CIVIL WAR]

control of NARRATIVE (control over you).

>(control over you)

 

YOU are the news– FAKE NEWS?

Who? Us? The PEOPLE?

Or, "anons"?

Anonymous ID: 7aec94 March 14, 2019, 11:22 a.m. No.5680291   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0300

>>5680286

"You are the news now"

The "anon" literally flaunting a "CIA" bakers meme.

Our "joke"– haha, CIA…?

Or symbolic MOCKERY?

What is the game being played?

I mean LOOK– it is "CIA bakery" with a BLACK hat.

Come on now.

What is FAKE NEWS?

What controls the narrative?

Is FAKE NEWS controlled by something, or is IT in control?

"You are the news now"

Anonymous ID: 7aec94 March 14, 2019, 11:22 a.m. No.5680300   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0311

>>5680291

WHAT CONTROLS THE NARRATIVE?

 

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/203177283

 

Q Hate Thread

Anonymous (ID: W2AS09Do) 02/14/19(Thu)14:38:06 No.203177283▶>>203177396 >>203177548 >>203177653 >>203177878 >>203178067 >>203178309 >>203178556 >>203178815 >>203179542 >>203179674 >>203179727

This faggot has dickteased us for 3 years and has nothing to show for it. There is no military tribunals. Hillary is not gonna get indicted. Obummer isn’t gonna get tried for his crimes and his faggotry will never be revealed. Tranny Michelle faggot will never be exposed. The fact that RGB is really a man and died of prostate cancer will never be revealed. Pizza pedo faggots like Alefantis and Podesta will never see the rope. There will be no justice. It’ll all end the same. Zognaldstein will continue to shill for the long nose tribe and the wall will never be built. It was all a pipe dream. A fucking larp. Fuck you Q!!! You had me fucker! I wish I knew who you were so I could kick the living shit out of you! Fuck!!!!!!

 

 

So how does this work guys?

"4chan hates Q".

Q got run off 4chan.

 

AND YET.

 

Here, we (seemingly) imitate fake-seeming posts from 4chan, and continually push a flood of chan talking points out, even though they aren't related to what Q says, and often contradict him… Does this make sense?

 

So, Q is "chan" as far as having chan talking points spewed at him– and is IDENTIFIED with “chans” by the MSM narrative (which says that Q is "some chan guy"), BUT, from this end, Q is in fact HATED by 4chan. The anons hate Q! But the anons follow Q, and the anons ARE Q!

 

Is ANY of that believably organic?

Is 4chan controlled?

Is this board controlled in the same way 4chan is?

Where does it all come from?

Who is pulling the strings on fake chans?

 

Everything is infiltrated

 

Well, what form does that take? What controls this board? Did our enemies seek control with their massive data, massive AI investment, and massive penetration (vault 7)? Is that infiltration?

THINK: How can Q have it both ways– both identified with the chans, and hated by the chans– getting the WORST of both sides? Is one side or the other fake, or are they BOTH fake?

 

Will PEOPLE wake up and question what is going on, or what?

 

I repeat: “Q is some chan guy” is the MSM talking point– now look at all the unrealistically overdone “chan culture” spewing that gets pushed here, and keeps the threads flying by– is that strongly REINFORCING this false MSM narrative? Look at the “band of anons” “this is /qresearch” video– same thing. Pushing the image of wacky, autistic, infantile, yet somehow mystical and magical (yet scary and intimidating if you try to come here!) “anons”–and fully identifying Q with that; it FITS the MSM narrative– and serves no other purpose.

 

EVERY ASPECT of what goes on on the “chans” is rigged against Q.

 

How could this be?

Anonymous ID: 7aec94 March 14, 2019, 11:23 a.m. No.5680311   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0342

>>5680300

What gets censored by the "board owner" here?

Do people pay attention?

Is it said to be a "free speech board"?

Is it really?

BO admits to censoring some people.

Why does it get censored?

What gets censored?

Is BO accountable? Transparent? A patriot? Are we sure? Are we REALLY sure?

 

If someone wrote quality content and tried to make a thread, would it get censored?

Is only "chan style" content allowed?

Forced image?

Forced low level of discourse?

How do you know?

 

Look what gets censored. These were all written by an anon FOR HERE, and got censored– why?

 

Can it be more clear– are patriots NOT ALLOWED to have a voice here, if they don't follow what "anons" dictate is "the culture of chans"? Is that real or fake?

 

Why would Q want us here, to be dominated by a system of suppression?

There IS a reason– but can we wait for “anons” to tell us? Or Q to spoonfeed?

Or do WE the PEOPLE have to wake up, and speak up?