Anonymous ID: f559d4 March 14, 2019, 12:20 p.m. No.5682042   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2195

>>5682000

They didn't have to tell him. All it would have taken was one question to Mike Rogers in the SCIF meeting or a phone call to Sessions.

 

I understand your frustration, but the simple fact of the matter is that the FBI would not have to tell him for Trump to be in the know.

Anonymous ID: f559d4 March 14, 2019, 12:27 p.m. No.5682225   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5682195

 

How many degrees of separation are there in an investigation on a campaign and the person who headed that campaign? One.

 

How many downstream/upstream taps are allowed with a FIS warrant? Six.

 

Trump didn't need to be a target to be spied upon.

 

You getting angry about it has no bearing on the situation.

Anonymous ID: f559d4 March 14, 2019, 12:30 p.m. No.5682308   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5682195

"if the FBI did not tell Potus there was an investigation, he could not have obstructed in any way."

 

Trump is a part of his campaign whether you like it or not. Comey lied, repeatedly, already by that pointโ€“why not lie to his face? What are YOU not getting?