>>5683293 (LB)
What the fuck are you talking about? Everybody trusted him, that's why he was picked BY TRUMP you moron, and voted in 94-6 by the Senate. You need to wake up, your theory has some serious holes in it.
What evidence do you have that he's fooling his wife? And of what?
Seriously, ya'll are getting silly making up crimes that never happened,
or even exist. Hell, someone on a previous bread legitimately tried to
claim that because RR was in MD when the first U1 indictment was
unsealed that RR must be guilty. Literally claiming that being in the
same state as an indictment is justification for an accusation of treason. Unbelievable.
By itself not all that unusual because that's how they get paid typically.
Sudden changes are sometimes notable, however.
I hope they don't. Think about it… an SC has limited resources, limited power, and will potentially take years with nothing but a non-stop show of nonsense. A US attorney has more power and more resources than an SC, and frankly, we know there are already some on the task.
Fair enough. All too often these speculations are really just hidden accusations
that have no basis in fact.
No, I don't know what she's doing there, but being a lawyer would be my first guess.
She was a US Attorney after all. The interwebs say she represents the NIH
in FOIA requests.
BTW, not sure if anyone has pointed this out yet, but RR graduated from
Wharton. Someone else we know did as well…