Anonymous ID: 6ee2a1 March 14, 2019, 3:29 p.m. No.5686884   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6917 >>6940 >>7071 >>7134 >>7486

PS Testimony

They were frustrated that they were not able to examine all the evidence. Twarted by the DOJ and ultimately by HRC's attorney [David Kendall]

They never found evidence of intent -

But they were questioning the sort criteria and limitations legal gave them. (Was that on purpose by HRC people?)

Anonymous ID: 6ee2a1 March 14, 2019, 3:34 p.m. No.5686975   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5686940

Theres some odd questions about 'metadata' but where never followed thru on the testimony. Not sure why there was no further PS questions to him on that.

 

Assuming no follow thru with PS doesn't mean much….

Anonymous ID: 6ee2a1 March 14, 2019, 3:36 p.m. No.5687023   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5686940

All really good questions, same I had.

We know that a full record of HRC's pst file before bleachbit is with him on a thumbdrive (David Kendall)

Anonymous ID: 6ee2a1 March 14, 2019, 3:40 p.m. No.5687091   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7118 >>7134 >>7156

>>5686917

Repeating what I have read now 3 full sessions Ohr,Page,Strozk.

The DOJ was trying to put intent into it.

This is HIS recounting of that.

I'm not saying its in there - but here's what he says on that front.

 

UCMJ action….and very limited use.