Anonymous ID: 635de6 March 18, 2019, 9:44 a.m. No.5753883   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1221 >>1613 >>1662 >>1326 >>5277

>>5686988

The Bruges Group is the highly respected think tank dedicated to leaving the EU. Founded in 1989 after a speech by Margaret Thatcher they include very heavy hitters and according to their website some of the figures to have addressed their meetings are:

 

Michael Howard MP, Iain Duncan Smith MP, Baroness Thatcher, Frank Field MP, Michael Portillo MP, John Redwood MP, Nigel Farage MEP, Lord Tebbit of Chingford, Lord Bell, Dr Cris Shore – author of Building Europe, Graeme Leach – Chief Economist at the IoD, Martin Howe QC – author of Europe and the Constitution after Maastrict, Bill Jamieson – Executive Editor of The Scotsman, Jens-Peter Bonde – Danish MEP and leader of the June Movement, Dr John Hulsman of the Heritage Foundation, Washington D.C.

 

Now in an absolutely explosive revelation they have just published the following to their website:

 

On Monday July 9th 2018, several leading French, German and Dutch senior managers were called by EU officials to an urgent meeting.

 

The meeting was said to be private and those present were informed that Prime Minister May and Chancellor Merkel had reached an Agreement over Brexit. Knowledge of this was attained from the actual transcript of the meeting between May and Merkel.

 

1) The Agreement was couched in a way to ‘appease’ the Brexit voters.

 

2) The Agreement would enable May to get rid of those people in her party who were against progress and unity in the EU.

 

3) Both Merkel and May agreed that the likely course of events would be that UK would re-join the EU in full at some time after the next general election.

 

4) May agreed to keep as many EU laws and institutions as she could despite the current groundswell of ‘anti-EU hysteria’ in Britain (May’s own words, apparently.)

 

5) Merkel and May agreed that the only realistic future for the UK was within the EU.

 

The original Agreement draft was completed in May 2018 in Berlin and then sent to the UK Government Cabinet Office marked ‘Secret’.

 

NB This Agreement draft was authored in the German Chancellor’s private office.

 

The Cabinet returned the Agreement draft with suggestions, and there was some to-ing and fro-ing during June 5th 2018.

 

Private calls between the Prime Minister and Chancellor were made.

Anonymous ID: 635de6 March 24, 2019, 9 a.m. No.5863394   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3607

>>5861429

Did May consult Trump on this and come up with the following plan?

We know that last year Q posted "May neutralised" meaning perhaps that she was now either impotent to prevent the Trump plan moving forward or that she was now a part of the team. Trump has said he advised May on how to deal with the EU but that "She chose to ignore his advice."

But did she though?

 

This is what I have been wondering as well! I remember when she was asked what Trump’s advice was, she hesitated a long moment, then claimed it was to to “sue the EU.” What if that was only one option they discussed?

Anonymous ID: 635de6 March 24, 2019, 3:58 p.m. No.5870706   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1179

>>5868634

I was doubtful that Mueller was /ourguy/ and maybe he wasn’t but whether he was clipped or neutralized, it’s a win for us. I could see how May could prove to be the British Mueller…someone for Remoaners to pin their hopes to, only to have the rug pulled out. But just as with Mueller, the whole point is neither side knows.

 

If May wasn’t flipped then it could be Q has other ways to neutralize her.

Anonymous ID: 635de6 March 24, 2019, 6:50 p.m. No.5873813   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3834

“The UK’s decision to leave the EU now means that many of these euroquangos, which were of limited use to the UK already, threaten to increasingly act against the UK’s wider interests if we remain signed up to them. This will be particularly evident once power has been restored but regulatory divergence occurs.

 

Leaving offers an opportunity, not just to repatriate powers over certain areas to domestic bodies, but also to take things much further. Restoring some of these powers to central departments, to ministers beholden to a sovereign Parliament, and then devolving where appropriate to the regions and beyond, could be one of the biggest potential benefits of Brexit as yet unrealised.

 

However, that can only be achieved if the UK actively decides to administratively separate itself from the EU. The closer the UK is to the working parts of the machinery of EU governance, the more likely it is that our tie will get caught in the gears.”

Anonymous ID: 635de6 March 25, 2019, 9:21 a.m. No.5881762   🗄️.is 🔗kun

May is in Parliament right now. So many Remoaners there, demanding that she betray Brexit. I can't tell if she will. Neither can they. They are demanding a clear answer and she won't give one. She won't say that a No Deal Brexit won't happen….

Anonymous ID: 635de6 March 25, 2019, 4:01 p.m. No.5889616   🗄️.is 🔗kun

"“The Honorable member said that this was a constitutional innovation… I think He may have rather just underestimated the fact…it is a constitutional revolution and the House will come to regret it.”