>>5696893

Doing ti "for real" introduces too many risks. You don't want to risk any heroes interfering, surviving families asking too many questions, anyone involved suddenly growing a conscious. It's easier to get people to go along with it if they know nobody actually died.

>>5696930

You'd think there would be at least one "Allah Akbar" or "God help us" in the video, but nothing.

>>5696952

Here's 8chan's IP address and onion address. Keep them handy just in case.

http://206.223.147.214/index.html

http://oxwugzccvk3dk6tj.onion/

>>5696960

Not a single bullet hole in the walls! What are the odds of that?

>>5696970

Massive pile of bodies at 2:28. Not even a single puddle of blood. Walls are perfectly white despite multiple shots into the piles. LOL!

>>5696967

Here's a high quality version of the video, Anon. Watch it yourself and laugh at how fake and gay it is.

>>5696986

>>5696993

Watch 2:48 closely, Anon. There's no bullet hole in the body, LOL. Shooter walks past the same body 10 seconds later, but there's no new blood in the clothing or floor. Clever spray, like hitting a ketchup packet, but doesn't hold up once you get past the shock value.

>>5697005

>>5697005

Try going directly to 8chan's IP address rather than the 8ch.net domain.

http://206.223.147.214/index.html

>>5696986

>>5697058

Nice catch, Anon.

>>5697244

Think about all of the virtual and augmented reality tech that Facebook has, Anon. It's no coincidence this livestream happened less than 24 hours after the big Facebook outage.

>>5697325

I'm convinced the mob helped the white hats in Las Vegas.

>>5697134

>>5697379

Can you explain how the walls, furniture, glass doors, and windows remain undamaged and clean despite the shooter spraying the place with hundreds of bullets?

>>5697409

>>5697395

If the man was shot against the wall, then there would be blood splatter and damage against the wall. Instead the wall looks fine and there's a puddle of red liquid on the floor (no splatters, just a puddle) with a man propped against it. FAKE.

>>5697419

Are you suggesting that the shooter had 100 percent accuracy and there wasn't a single bullet that missed a body?

>>5697420

>>5697420

>Of course people died.

>But real people really died.

Notice how they all state this as an unquestionable fact, but refuse to provide any proof. Apparently you are not allowed to question the narrative.

If you are genuine Anons, then you are no worse than the Leftists trying to censor us.

>>5697451

>>5697442

You only have insults because even you can't defend this half-assed production.

What are the odds that not a single stray bullet hit the walls or furniture?

>>5697442

This video is not low quality. >>5696986 Why are the walls undamaged, Anon?

The absolute desperation to pretend that a mass shooter was allegedly able to kill dozens of people, but not damage a single piece of wall, furniture, or glass door is hilarious.

>>5697517

>>5697494

49 dead and not a single exit wound to the wall or furniture. What are the odds of that?

>>5697537

Here's a high-quality video in this very thread. I encourage all to watch. >>5696986

So are you suggesting that out of 49 victims, there wasn't a single exit wound or stray bullet?

>>5697554

Then I must be the world's worst shill because here I am encouraging people to write down 8chan's IP and onion address. >>5696961

The desperation to shut down all logical questions about this hoax are genuinely making me LOL.

>>5697571

If the dude shot from "feet away," then there would be exit wounds causing blood splatter and damage to the floors and walls.