>>5691398 /pb Q
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-newly-released-transcript-former-fbi-lawyer-fires-back-on-charges-anti-trump-bias-affected-trump-and-clinton-probes/2019/03/12/f669f198-44f9-11e9-8aab-95b8d80a1e4f_story.html
>“Many of us in law enforcement dislike the subject of our investigations. We are not keen on pedophiles and fraudsters and spies and human traffickers,” Page said.
Out of her entire testimony, that's the line they chose to highlight. Shocking.
Like they had such a stellar record in tackling pedophilia & trafficking.
Funny how she decides to mention it after the fact. Guilty conscience, Lisa?
>“That is fine. What would be impermissible is to take that harsh language and to act in some way that was illegal or against the rules. And we don’t do it.”
We shall see about that, won't we.