>>5702205 (pb)
(((They))) need WW3 now, NZ provocation to incite muslims WW
Division attempt.
Full armor of God.
NZ
How does a foreigner get military style weapons in a country with reasonably strict gun laws?????????
Multiple shooters now it's a lone shooter????
GLADIO FF
A NEW MEDIA LOW! Daily Mail Blames Trump For NZ Terror Attack on US Page — BUT NOT on UK Page!
A NEW LOW!
The Daily Mail blamed President Trump for the New Zealand terror attack on their US home page.
But they omitted the non-existent “Trump connection” on their UK page.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/03/holy-crap-a-new-media-low-daily-mail-blames-trump-for-nz-terror-attack-on-us-page-but-not-on-uk-page/
'Change your course!': Pompeo threatens ICC over US war crimes probe
In an effort to threaten everyone into not investigating US or Israeli war crimes in the International Criminal Court, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo says anyone involved in such probes will lose their visa and may be sanctioned.
The Washington war hawk said that action had to be taken because any investigation into alleged war crimes and torture committed by the United States would be a threat to US rule of law. Visas will be pulled or denied for anyone who has been involved in or even requested an ICC investigation of “any US personnel.”
The ICC is currently mulling over a request to investigate possible war crimes committed by the US in Afghanistan in the course of the nearly 20-year conflict which has left over 100,000 Afghans dead. The international court prosecutor’s office says it has “reasonable basis” to believe that “war crimes and crimes against humanity” were, and continue to be, committed by foreign government forces in Afghanistan.
Pompeo openly stated that the action was intended to get the court to drop the potential investigation, and that Washington was ready to further increase the pressure if they don’t do as he says.
“We are prepared to take additional steps, including economic sanctions, if the ICC does not change course,” he said.
https://www.rt.com/news/453951-pompeo-icc-visa-revoke/
Weapon suppliers of Bataclan-terrorists arrested in Amsterdam
Dutch police arrested two men in Amsterdam that were involved in the terror attacks in Paris in 2015. Two men of the age of 29 and 31 years old are under investigation because of weapons that were used by IS terrorists.
Members of a jihadist terror cell were visiting the Netherlands in 2015 to collect weapons such as Kalashnikovs and explosives. The suspects, the two arrested men, may be involved in the delivery of those arms, writes Algemeen Dagblad.
The police that formed an international team of Dutch, Belgian and French investigators, suspect that with these weapons, IS committed attacks in Paris. The attacks at the Stade de France, various cafes and in the Bataclan concert hall killed 129 and more than 350 were wounded.
One of the suspects was released om Thursday, because of health issues. This prevents him from being put in a cell. He is still considered a suspect. The other suspect is only allowed to have contact with his lawyer.
House searches were also carried out at home with the arrested men. In addition, computers, documents, other data carriers and mobile phones were seized.
https://voiceofeurope.com/2019/03/weapon-suppliers-of-of-bataclan-terrorists-arrested-in-amsterdam/
One video I watched yesterday had no sound but as he was in the hallway there were mussel flashes still going in the other room.
US Military Doctrine: Nuclear Weapons, Cyber Attacks, Fifth Columns
On March 14, US Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan and Gen. Joseph Dunford, the Joint Chiefs of Staff chair, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee on President Donald Trump’s 2020 defense budget request.
The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff came out with several important remarks regarding the current US military doctrine and its expected actions in the event of conflict with some “adversary”.
Dunford warned against changing the current US military policy which allows the country to be the first to use nuclear weapons during a possible conflict. The general emphasized that he “absolutely” believes that “the current policy is the right policy”.
“I wouldn’t make any decisions to simplify an adversary’s decision-making calculus. I can also imagine a few situations where we wouldn’t want to remove that option from the president”, he stressed.
Dunford added that cyber weapons will unlikely replace nuclear forces, but stressed that the US should be ready to carry out offensive cyber operations. Describing the need for cybyer operations, he mentioned China and Russia as well as cyber attacks allegedly conducted by these two states as the reason behind this need.
These remarks come in crouse of the newly appearing US miltiary doctrine, which actively employs nuclear threats, cyber attacks and ‘fifth columns’ in order to contain and defeat supposed US ‘adversaries’. This doctrine was in details described by the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Russia General Valeriy Gerasimov earlier in March.
“Pentagon started to develop a qualitatively new strategy of military operations which has already been dubbed the “Trojan horse”.
It amounts to active use of the “protest potential of a potential fifth column” in the interests of destabilizing situation while simultaneously precision-guided munition (PGM) strikes are launched at key targets,” General Gerasimov sated describing a part of it.
Most likely, this new US doctrine is currently being employed in Venezuela. However, in the event of conflict with Russia the success of this strategy of agression will hardly be possible without the employment of nuclear forces, at least precision tactical nuclear strikes.
This is the real reason of Dunford’s remarks in favor of the first-strike nuclear policy. The rest is mostly a formal justification for such an approach. Speculations that Russia may employ tactical nuclear weapons in some conflict in order to achieve a victory before the intervention of US or NATO forces are ridiculous. There are two main reasons:
The political and military doctrine of Russia does not include such provisions. The Russian leadership does not have levers to conduct such a step.
All possible local conflicts in which Russia may participate in the coming decades could appear in regions near Russian borders only. These are Ukraine, Belarus, the Caucasus and Central Asia. If one supposes that Russia is ready to use nuclear weapons in these regions, the same person should believe that Russia is ready to strike with nuclear weapons itself. This seems too much even for the “bloody Putin regime”.
https://southfront.org/us-military-doctrine-nuclear-weapons-cyber-attacks-fifth-column/
Kabul Accuses U.S. Peace Envoy of ‘Delegitimizing’ Afghan Govt, ‘Elevating’ Taliban
The National Security Adviser of Afghanistan on Thursday accused U.S. President Donald Trump’s envoy in charge of peace negotiations with the Taliban of “delegitimizing” and “weakening” the Kabul government during the talks to serve his ambitions of one day running the war-ravaged country.
An official from the U.S. Department of State (DOS) — which oversees the office of U.S. reconciliation envoy Zalmay Khalilzad — denied the assertions by Hamdullah Mohib, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani’s national security adviser who served as ambassador to Washington.
“Mr. Mohib’s comments are inaccurate and unhelpful, and we will be responding to them privately,” a State Department official told the Daily Beast on condition of anonymity.
“His comments do not in any way reflect the high level of U.S.-Afghan coordination on all matters involving peace in Afghanistan,” the official added.
Despite U.S. insistence that Kabul leads and owns the ongoing talks to end the more than 17-year-old conflict — America’s most extended — the Taliban continues to refuse to allow the Afghan government to participate.
Both sides have claimed “progress” in the wake of the longest round of U.S.-Taliban discussions to date, which ended this week. However, it appears Kabul is not happy about being left out.
Referring to Khalilzad, Mohib told reporters on Thursday, “The reason he is delegitimizing the Afghan government and weakening it, and at the same time elevating the Taliban can only have one approach. It’s definitely not for peace. He is not reconciling, he’s alienating.”
The top Afghan official added:
We think either Ambassador Khalilzad doesn’t know how to negotiate and there may be other reasons behind what he’s doing. But what he’s doing is not getting a deal that would result in peace in Afghanistan.
…
Knowing Ambassador Khalilzad’s own personal history, he has ambitions in Afghanistan. He wanted to run for president twice… people in government think perhaps all this talk is to create a caretaker government of which he will then become the Viceroy.
He suggested Khalilzad is not doing his job as Trump’s envoy, noting, “I don’t think the president has instructed to delegitimize the Afghan government. I don’t think the president has instructed to disrespect the Afghan people.”
Instead of convincing the Taliban to engage Kabul during the five times the two sides have officially met since last fall, Khalilzad has sidelined the Afghan government, Mohib complained.
He said Khalilzad has failed to give the Taliban a reason to invite Kabul into the talks as the terrorist group prepares “for a full-on spring offensive” against the U.S.-backed Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF). Taliban jihadis have intensified attacks during peace negotiations.
Despite tens of billions of dollars in American funding devoted to its development, the ANDSF — which includes police and army units — continues to struggle against the Taliban.
https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2019/03/14/kabul-accuses-u-s-peace-envoy-delegitimizing-afghan-govt-elevating-taliban/
Sen. Lindsey Graham Calls for a Special Counsel to Investigate FBI, DOJ
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) took to the Senate Floor on March 14 to call for the appointment of a new special counsel to investigate possible misconduct by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI.
Graham made the remarks in response to a Democrat-backed resolution that passed in the House unanimously earlier in the day, which calls for any final report in special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation to be made public. The South Carolina senator said the resolution should be amended before it is considered in the Senate.
He summarized his proposed changes in a tweet on March 14, requesting that the “House-passed Mueller resolution should be amended to include [the] appointment of a Special Counsel to:
*) Investigate alleged misconduct around the handling of the Clinton email investigation.
*) Investigate the abuse of the FISA warrant process against Mr. Carter Page.”
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant allows for some of the most invasive surveillance methods on someone suspected of spying with or for a foreign government.
“Was there two systems of justice in 2016? One for the Democratic candidate and one for the Republican candidate?” Graham said during his Senate address. “Where the Republican candidate’s campaign had a FISA warrant issued against someone associated with it based on a document that was known to be unreliable [and] politically charged on four different occasions.”
He continued, “This should bother every American and rather than me telling you whether it happened or not why don’t we appoint a Mueller-like figure to look at how the Clinton email investigation ended up the way it did and what the tarmac meeting was all about between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton.”
https://www.theepochtimes.com/sen-lindsey-graham-calls-for-a-special-counsel-to-investigate-fbi-doj_2839642.html
Total corruption: Government regulators relied on industry-funded herbicide studies to declare glyphosate safe
When the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a designation of “safe and effective” with regards to Monsanto’s infamously controversial Roundup (glyphosate-based) herbicide, in direct contradiction to opposing findings by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) that identified glyphosate as a “probable human carcinogen,” the pro-chemical lobby quickly declared itself the victor in this heated and ongoing debate. But what the public was never told is that the EPA relied largely on industry-funded pseudoscience in giving its stamp of approval for glyphosate, while IARC carefully considered legitimate, peer-reviewed scientific studies before ultimately concluding and declaring that Roundup more than likely causes cancer.
As reported by Colin Todhunter of Off-Guardian.org (and republished by CounterPunch.org), these disparate findings between the EPA and IARC have continued to fuel an ongoing battle by independent activists against Big Agrochemical, particularly in Europe where Dr. Charles M. Benbrook published a study baring the full truth about the corruption within the EPA that led the industry-compromised agency to make a patently false declaration about the alleged safety and effectiveness of Roundup and glyphosate.
As revealed by Dr. Benbrook in his paper, the EPA’s consortium of “evidence” proving the safety and effectiveness of glyphosate was mostly derived from the very corporations that profit from its sale. IARC, on the other hand, looked at real published science that wasn’t tainted by the chemical industry, and that simply evaluated glyphosate from a neutral perspective.
“EPA and IARC reached diametrically opposed conclusions on glyphosate genotoxicity for three primary reasons,” Dr. Benbrook explains in his paper, these three reasons, verbatim, being:
• “(1) in the core tables compiled by EPA and IARC, the EPA relied mostly on registrant-commissioned, unpublished regulatory studies, 99% of which were negative, while IARC relied mostly on peer-reviewed studies of which 70% were positive (83 of 118).”
• (2) “EPA’s evaluation was largely based on data from studies on technical glyphosate, whereas IARC’s review placed heavy weight on the results of formulated GBH and AMPA assays.”
• (3) “EPA’s evaluation was focused on typical, general population dietary exposures assuming legal, food-crop uses, and did not take into account, nor address generally higher occupational exposures and risks. IARC’s assessment encompassed data from typical dietary, occupational, and elevated exposure scenarios.”
For more related news on glyphosate and Roundup, be sure to check out Glyphosate.news and Roundup.news.
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/total-corruption-government-regulators-relied-on-industry-funded-herbicide-studies-to-declare-glyphosate-safe/
https://www.infowars.com/ann-coulter-trump-ignoring-deplatforming-of-alex-jones-other-top-supporters/
Q called it