Well done, anon.
Wondering why, after all the (SIS/)CIA assets put to work to get the 'Russiagate' bs rolling in FBI/DOJ, would POTUS support a CIA-hatched regime change op in Venezuela, and name a neocon war criminal to coordinate?
Doesn't jive. Same as the declass delay, which seems to only protect those (SIS/)CIA handlers. Timing is what I've been told. Still skeptical on that front, though.
In related (contradictory) news, the word on NSA abrogation of 4A privileges is that it continues under different authorizations. Unable to explain why that wouldn't have been curtailed (and thinking of all the premature congratulating that went on right after word was it was being ended).
https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/whistleblowers-say-nsa-still-spies-on-american-phones-under-hidden-program-3aeaf457cd1f
"“Why would anyone believe a bloody word of what NSA says about their mass domestic surveillance programs?” said Tice, who was the first NSA whistleblower who exposed unlawful surveillance and wiretaps of American citizens as early as May 2005. “They have lied repeatedly in the past and they are likely lying now. They have been collecting meta data and content, word-for-word, both voice and text, for some time now.”
I asked Tice how certain he was that the NSA was still conducting phone surveillance of Americans in the United States. “Of course NSA is still conducting phone and computer comms surveillance and yes, ‘wider programs’ go on and a new massive program that is more efficient is likely to have already been implemented,” he told me.
The real reason the current program has become defunct is because there is now better technology for more advanced surveillance."
"Tice and Drake’s views corroborate an independent analysis by The Register, which observes that the association of the Freedom Act’s Section 215 program with phone metadata could be advantageous for the agency:
“If the NSA offers to give up its phone metadata collection voluntarily, it opens up several opportunities for the agency. For one, it doesn’t have to explain what its secret legal interpretations of the law are and so can continue to use them. Second, it can repeat the same feat as in 2015 — give Congress the illusion of bringing the security services to heel. And third, it can continue to do exactly what it was doing while looking to everyone else that it has scaled back.
Here’s one thing we are sure of: the NSA has already figured out how to get all the information that was gathered through the metadata part of Section 215. It will be through a different law under a different secret legal interpretation.”"