On Twitter some people are already posting the NYPD statements regarding the Wiener laptop in answer to the comments about faking videos.
I think this is a good strategy and even better would be if we can encourage the NYPD officers involved to say more about what was in those videos and more about their reactions too it.
If anything is released publicly it doesn't need to be a damning view at first. Just enough to show that the NYPD was talking about a real video and Hillary is on it. Just a glimpse.
If Hillary says that what we see is fake, everybody will get very suspicious because it won't have shown anything significant at all. The real action will be with the NYPD. And when enough video is released to prove that it exists. We can get more interviews with police officers about their reactions to what they saw, and some vague descriptions of it.
Again, there will be no video to attack. How can you attack police witnesses?
After a week or so then more of the video could be released with some truly incriminating parts. At that point nobody will be ready to believe that the video was faked. They will all believe it is a real video and will be demanding to see it.
This is why staging and patience is necessary. This is how you break through cognitive dissonance.