>>571688

432 hz is pretty much bunk

t. musician anon

>>571719

just listening to music at normal levels doesnt produce any cellular cymatic response

trust me it's not a real thing, im 99% sure.

>>571756

there is a slight difference in tone, i can hear the difference entirely. it's just not a huge one.

im just saying 432 hz is not a big "thing" like i see it made out to be

>>571743

>>571771

432hz makes some chords clash and sound very wrong, im trying to find them now

>>571859

lol "mastering" has nothing to do with the process of producing a sound tonally, cmon dude

it's bunk. listen to any comparison video and the 432 hz sounds flat and iffy, especially on certain progressions.