Anonymous ID: b84896 March 15, 2019, 6:48 p.m. No.5712555   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2635 >>2698 >>2700 >>2787 >>2828 >>2895

I'm seeing the local msm narrative very quickly (within 24 hours) of the shooting in NZ turn rampantly against the internet and social media, side-by-side with calls for even tighter gun control.

Please understand, the only thing this horrific event has to do with NZ was the physical location it took place. NZ is a long-term strategic ally with numerous countries, obviously including the US. The implications are worldwide.

Wether FF or not, is almost irrelevant. Regardless, the narrative is now set. Watch for increasing calls for government/corporate control over the "weaponisation of the internet".

 

"We can not allow hate speech to exist online…" etc etc.

 

Literally only a few hours after the shooting stopped, the major internet/cell companies in NZ blocked access to 8ch entirely. This was one of the FIRST RESPONSES other than police/hospital etc. This should trouble everyone.

At the same time people were still being treated for gunshot wounds, someone was giving the order to block all access to an online message board.

 

If you accept Q is operating under some kind of military allowance, then you also accept that the online sphere is now a battlefield and part of contemporary multi-dimensional conflict. If Q serves to legitimately help rid the world of evil and corruption at the highest levels, then is it purely coincidence that the first thing they shut down in NZ was direct access to Q posts and research?

 

All Anons should forget the foreign/domestic illusion with this event. It is looking like a mini "internet 9/11" just happened.

Anonymous ID: b84896 March 15, 2019, 7:06 p.m. No.5712842   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5712787

>the public demonization of a person or group resulting in theincitement of a violent ac

I have never once done this, nor will I ever. Seems you're trying to make your glove fit the wrong hand here.