Anonymous ID: fa0875 March 15, 2019, 6:34 p.m. No.5712293   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2402

>>5712264

>>>5711937 Timestamp faggin <- 08:41:00 trifecta (needs re-ver, some anons dont like this one yet)

it's nonsense baker, hh:mm and mm:ss, plus the cap is in pst while the others are in est

Anonymous ID: fa0875 March 15, 2019, 6:41 p.m. No.5712402   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5712359

see: >>5712293

it's retarded

also see: >>5712341

>so did anyone/does anyone think its weird to see the Q posts above and see the TOMORROW IS FRIDAY posted FRIDAY above?

noticed that last night, either Q was posting FOR non-EST anons, or Q wasn't EST

Anonymous ID: fa0875 March 15, 2019, 7:03 p.m. No.5712810   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5712706

>no notes this bread yet

>since board has been laggy ive kinda been doing this one bread behind notables thing

>this bread is fine im not behind

I'm not really sure what you mean by going into the last bread.

We need to be keeping up with the current bread. This system you have might work for slower breads, but with 300+ UIDs and Q posting, it could get really hard.

I think that's what my fellow bakerfren is trying to convey.

Sometime soon I'd like to hear your reasoning behind your system. Not while you're baking though, focus on that.

Anonymous ID: fa0875 March 15, 2019, 7:10 p.m. No.5712902   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2958

>>5712883

>im not sure what other bakers do from post 0-200-250

look for notables in this bread

what exactly are you reading from last bread?

>theres plenty of time

and again, it could get hard to do in really fast breads, which we've been having

Anonymous ID: fa0875 March 15, 2019, 7:13 p.m. No.5712958   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5712883

>>5712902

I personally set up the pastebin, set up the new thread, and then look for notables

with updates at 200, 400, and 600 so anons can weigh in

bake at 680, and post a fresh bread post around 735 to 740