Q and trump posting with delta 0 mins is no longer a proof for me. I have a script to find posts based on an arbitrary time delta and time window (for example 60 seconds, or 5 minutes) and have found no significant difference between delta 0 and any other arbitrary delta. This means it is completely in the real of statistically possible.
Realm*
Unless the delta 0 posts significantly increase, it is just coincidence based on the amount they both post.
I can post the data to prove it. I'm on mobile right now. I posted the spread sheet on an old thread for people to do their own calculations. But I can post my script later.
I am going to put a full report together for u guys. Unless Q can give us proof, I am no longer using 0 delta as proof, unless like I said, the amount increases.
For example, If I select delta 60 minutes (window 1 min) I get very similar numbers to delta 0 (window 1 min). Similar numbers for any other delta. Nothing of significance.