>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source
You know, l>>5718107
>I had no strong opinions about the Q source >thing, but now I'm half-tempted to dig based >solely on the amount of hostility around it. If it >was truly nothing, then it would been ignored >and not dredged up from a previous bread.
Godspeed, Anon.
I say we all cancel any other plans, and get right on this wikipedia article that people were salivating over on Reddit last year in July, while all real research was going on right here on the chans.
Let me know when you read the first whole paragraph, and the inevitable conclusion I came when I first saw it 8 years ago, while studying something else.
Enjoy.