Deceivers, depart
Truth rises
Layers upon layers of lies
Fly away, peel by peel
Leave, liars
Goodbye
in fairness though…
Is "glowfag" organic?
Is it FROZEN lingo?
Is this board frozen in a rigid, inorganic system of lingo, enforced by "anons"?
Do "anons" force a rigid image on patriots?
THINK: Q posts here– does this
-
Change the culture of "chans" (ie, THIS one, this board)
or
-
Does Q ADAPT to chan culture?
What takes precedence?
One must, because they are too contradictory: Q's message, and enforced "chan culture" as we find it here.
So which makes sense? What is Q?
The MSM narrative is "Q is some 'chan guy'".
And here, "anons" enforce chan culture on the board, which reinforces the MSM narrative.
The "anons" portray Q as being A PRODUCT of "chans". Indeed, a huge number of "anon" posts are aimed at nothing but attacking anything that detracts from the "chan" image of everything here.
And yet, what is Q in reality? What is "chan culture" in relation to that? Ask yourselves, PATRIOTS. What is so POWERFUL about "chan culture" THAT IT ENFORCES ITSELF ON Q?
Is that organic?
Is Q a huge movement of patriots
Or is Q "some chan guy".
Why does this board reflect the answer you don't agree with PATRIOTS?
Do you remain silent, accepting the dominance of "anons"?
LOOK
THINK
SPEAK