>>5718927
Much agreed.
>>5718771
Re: your nice clockwork:
This year's 3/19 [-21] falls at [47] on Qclock.
Last year's 3/19 fell 5 days earlier at [42] on Qclock.
NowC@mesTHEP@in– -23!!! came at [43] (1 day later) along with "they thought it was coming yesterday" comment.
These things all line up in a very possible [48] 3/20 manner. It's the standard "year-to-year" 5-day clock jump from P@in at [43] and just happens to be one day after 3/19, our [-21] target day… a great candidate for "they thought it was going to happen yesterday" fulfillment. Just tossing it out there.