Anonymous ID: 2f4d1e March 7, 2018, 5:30 a.m. No.577204   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7283

>>574951

Thank god people finally are paying attention to the length.

 

These needs to be at a 9-10th grade reading level

 

#2 was written by clowns and you listened to them. This makes it illegal to stop them from DDOSing you. Think about this some more.

 

You have nothing to prevent them from stealing your privacy here.

Anonymous ID: 2f4d1e March 7, 2018, 9:48 a.m. No.578578   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8581

>>577876

Ok I've thought about this for a while.

 

"#WeThePeople hereby demand that our data, in its many forms, be recognized as an expression of our first amendment rights, and provided the same rights and freedoms from interference and obstruction."

 

This allows us to leverage everything already in the first amendment which is really what we are aiming for.

Anonymous ID: 2f4d1e March 7, 2018, 9:53 a.m. No.578607   🗄️.is 🔗kun

"Providers of a Public Internet Forum or Service must allow users to opt out of personally identifiable information data collection."

 

We need something like this. Facebook,Google and Twitter use this against us for censorship.

Anonymous ID: 2f4d1e March 7, 2018, 9:54 a.m. No.578614   🗄️.is 🔗kun

"personally identifiable information"

 

This is a legal term meaning uniquely identifiable to a person.

Anonymous ID: 2f4d1e March 7, 2018, 9:59 a.m. No.578644   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8657 >>9109

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our Natural Rights in the modern age.

 

2) #WeThePeople hereby demand that our data, in its many forms, be recognized as an expression of our first amendment rights, and provided the same rights and freedoms from interference and obstruction.

 

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

 

Still need a data clause, but as it is this is pretty good.

Anonymous ID: 2f4d1e March 7, 2018, 3:43 p.m. No.582207   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2366

I'm done with churning this variant unless anyone has any rights i'm missing. If we get around to another push.

 

1) #WethePeople demand the restoration of our Internet liberties taken from us by corporations of the internet!

2) Our data, in its many forms, must be recognized as an expression of our First Amendment rights, and provided the same rights and freedoms from interference and obstruction.

3) Unalienable rights provided to us by Law cannot be taken away by Terms of Service, License Agreements, Foreign Laws and other non-legally binding stipulations.

4) Providers of a Public Internet Forum or Service must obtain consent to retain Personally Identifiable Information and this permission must be revocable at any time. Consent is nontransferable.

5) Citizens subjected to violations are entitled to relief.

 

People keep rehashing and shitting on various rights with various rewrites and shill fuckery.

 

1) statement of intent (optional)

2) Enforces ALL 1st amendment rights on the data itself as if it were speech; I.E. the laws should work the same way.

3) Prevents contract and foreign law fuckery.

4) Completely neuters data collection,

5) Forces fines and other forms of punishment

Anonymous ID: 2f4d1e March 7, 2018, 4:15 p.m. No.582543   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2584

>>582421

800 limit appears when you're in the screen for the description.

 

Also this needs to be about a 9-10th grade reading level.

 

This site for example can measure it.

http:// www.readabilityformulas.com/free-readability-formula-tests.php