We must work together to get 100k signers for our next #WeThePeople petition! Get in here and help us write our Internet Bill of RIGHTS!

>Learn the Gospel of the perfect tweet and teach it to others.

>The Ice cream method has been replaced by the Kekistani Airforce Graph.

'''1) THE HASHTAGS DISPLAYED ON THE AIRPLANES MUST BE USED IN EVERY TWEET/REPLY/QUOTE.

NO EXCEPTIONS!'''

2) PICK 1 OR MORE TARGET HASHTAGS (they are written on the targets)

Add whatever other hashtags you like:

Examples:

• Something currently in the news

• Hijack something trending

• a short very popular hashtag (#News #MAGA #Fail #Fake #BREAKING etc.)

3)Tweet with URLs to Video or article score better.

4) ADD A MEME TO YOUR TWEET

5)DON'T FORGET POTUS

Always add @POTUS or @realDonaldTrump to your tweet. This way, twitter can not block your tweet.

6)INFORM GENERAL

General flows FAST and is chaotic. That's why general fags are so magical. War Room Fags are expected to post the current graphs on general threads and remind the bakers to add them to the dough. Eurotw_tf@g is in Europe, so US War Room anons, pls make sure General stays informed.

Send a perfect tweet inviting others to join the #QAnon Twitter Storm. ADD THE Airforce Graph to the tweet. Once you sent it, pin the tweet to your profile.

it will be the 1st thing new Meme Warriors will see and retweet.

Twt twt twt RT RT RT RT email email fb fb fb ETC.

>NOTE 1:

Q: we must spread GEOTUS tweets further, as MSM is not reporting. QAnon is now gaining worldwide traction. Keep pushing the hashtag and add everything to it.

>NOTE 2:

Stick to THE METHOD. It leaves every anon total chaotic freedom to react to any event in EVERY way you like. Narrative change leaves anons freedom to adapt. New Target hashes will be provided regularly.

>NOTE 3:

NEVER EVER TWEET WITHOUT OUR HASHTAGS. If you see someone tweeting without hashtags, send them the graph and ask them to start using them.

>NOTE 4:

War Room will make graphs to show General how we the Hashes are doing.

<NOTE 5:

War Room has Special Opps teams They Boldly go, where no Pepe has gone B4. If you like a bit of adventure, join the special Opps.

Currently, Special opps is feeding red pills to negative shitposters on GEOTUS twatter feed. If you need new followers, THIS is how to get them. JOIN THE SPECIAL OPPS.

Petition team:

War Room helps Petition fags out making them graphs and stuff. Help the petition fags: VOTE and RT their tweets.

Enou[g]h=En[o]ugh. We need to operate as ONE. It doesn't matter which hashes are used. As long as we make em TREND. We did good, but we can do MUCH MUCH better.

[g]raph [p]roves [r]esult.

We will do our best to inform ALL anons. TY WRL2HU.

Where we go one, we go all.

=

TOOLS

Stay On Target, like each other's tweets, and RETWEET

Try a burner phone/Email Adds & Phone Auth

10 Minute Mail 10minutemail.com

try Twitterfall.com to see how far your tweets go.

Hashtag Trackers hashtags.org updates on the hour | trends24.in | tweeplers.com/hashtags/?cc=US

Always Add @realDonaldTrump or @POTUS To All Tweets

If Your Tweet Has @realDonaldTrump OR @POTUS It CANNOT BE BLOCKED

=

Meme AMMO Threads

Main Meme Library

Over 11,800 images from Memes#1 thru Memes #10

mega.nz/#F!z1FCnaiA!4NS6tTnFmNs_yBZpKbCCgg

Here you can preview images, download single images, entire categories, or all.

Images Scaled for Twitter 1024 x 512

The same images, transformed in shape for optimal display on Twitter:

mega.nz/#F!Kxt2QSyC!0AK44ZpbsF5ASzTyhg6huw

If you're going to drop on Twitter, this format will be more effective.

Twitter Format Ready Memes from War Room

718 selected images from the War Room >>47341 (OP) harvested from General #49-#63

converted to Twitter format. Topics listed in >>64154

mega.nz/#F!OtNj1J6R!-oBb4qvw9yUy9joESNOgeQ

Side by side graphs >>93735

Meme Threads >>247769

Fake news memes >>79768

Side-by-Side Graphics >>93735

Archive War Room 5: http:// archive.is/k1Pqf

Archive War Room 6: http:// archive.is/JBlZL

Archive War Room 7: http:// archive.fo/Lu1AT

Internet Bill of Rights

Thomas Jefferson pointed out in the Declaration of Independence, that #WeThePeople possess "certain unalienable rights" which we were given by our Creator. These rights are inseparable from us: they are part of our humanity. Freedom of Speech is one of these rights, and is implicitly protected in the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally by parties that maintain, build, and develop communications infrastructure to include (but not limited to) cellular telephone providers, last mile infrastructure, and other products and services enabled by communications infrastructure to the furthest extent of the imagination.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as (but not limited to) TOS, EULAs, service clauses or other contractual stipulations.

If we have #1 we can sue entities that violate United States free speech laws.

#2 says what AT&T said but more.

#3 tells them that we don't care what they put on our screens that nobody reads or understands and it doesn't even matter because our unalienable rights supersede their garbage 'agreements'.

>>572509

>(AT&T, Our Guy?)

Q heavily implies that they'll back this. Eurwtf@g didn't want to use their exact wording but #2 includes what they said (and more). I don't have a problem with their exact wording.

>don’t throttle, discriminate, or degrade network performance based on content

But we're supposed to be working together which means compromise so I changed it and asked for more because why not?

>>572664

I think this might inadvertently include firewalls. Thoughts?

>>572668

>the priority is the #IBOR

I hear you, but just because the title is #IBOR doesn't mean we can't specifically target the important bit (the medium the internet exists on). If we only focus on the internet as it stands now we might screw future generations when something new exists and it's not covered by the 'internet' moniker. Calling it 'communications infrastructure' is pretty crafty since then the have to argue that something ISNT a piece of communications infrastructure and an easy test is obviously demonstrating communication with the medium in question. This could potentially cover everything from tin cans and bits of string to satellite comms.

>>572664

Ok I figured out the one detail that would make this really good, change 'connector(s)' to User. It's established terminology, unless you have some reason to call it 'connector' like I do 'internet' and 'communications infrastructure'.

>>572837

God helps those who help themselves.

>>572940

Thomas Jefferson pointed out in the Declaration of Independence, that #WeThePeople possess "certain unalienable rights" which we were given by our Creator. These rights are inseparable from us: they are part of our humanity. Freedom of Speech is one of these rights, and is implicitly protected in the Bill of Rights.

This delaration shall serve as a reminder of the great and innumerable powers granted to each and every human by our Creator. In addition, we remember and honor through precedent of this Declaration, the protections of the United States of America's, Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally by parties that maintain, build, and develop communications infrastructure to include (but not limited to) cellular telephone providers, last mile infrastructure, and other products and services enabled by communications infrastructure to the furthest extent of the imagination.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as (but not limited to) TOS, EULAs, service clauses or other contractual stipulations.

>Furthermore;

>We Demand Connector(s) Right to Privacy If They Choose.

Can be solved if competition is allowed, it's also important to remember that future tech will include more options which by demand will include everything you want in as many flavors as you can handle once real competition is allowed.

>We Demand that Once content is created it must remain, in its entirety on the global world wide network, unless

global world wide is redundant

>or until the creator decides to delete it themselves

Unfortunately this is unenforceable, think Streisand Effect.

>We Demand Connector(s) have the Right to Delete their Footprint to the best of their ability

This is unenforceable.

>We Demand Connector(s) Can Create Openly & Freely without Interference from any aspect or Access Point of the global world wide network.

Need to reword this but I like the idea.

>We Demand No such aspect of the global network shall be allowed to infringe on any other aspect or connector(s) right to access the global world wide network.

It would require the NSA to play ball and detect these attacks. Not saying it's not doable, just that it requires the NSA to play ball.

>This precedent set, shall allow us to proceed with Rule of Law regarding human rights when connected to the global world wide network, as connector(s) with this declaration as precedent we clearly are afforded our freedoms when we access the global world wide network

We can work with this too. How many characters do we get?

Shit, 800 characters might as well be a book.

Here's a more condensed version. 669chars

This Declaration shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally by parties that and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as (but not limited to) TOS, EULAs, service clauses or other contractual stipulations.

Fixed. Char Count: 663.

This Declaration shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as (but not limited to) TOS, EULAs, service clauses or other contractual stipulations.

>>573394

>mod >every American by God through the etc etc

I think God will forgive us for not namedropping him this time.

>mod >#WeThePeople - definition reqd

Self explanatory imo, it's at the beginning of our Constitution.

>mod> all personal communication traffic be treated as private by ALL entities Public and Private. Violators MUST be punished in accord with Private Law.

This can only be enforced by things like encryption which is beyond the scope of the IBOR, with an IBOR however entities would have to respect encrypted traffic which means God wins. If you have good encryption, then it is physically impossible to read your communication if you are not the intended recipient. Third party services can compete based on what they can prove they're not saving or sharing.

>>573400

Thanks for the help.

Made less bad again. Char Count: 646

This Declaration shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as (but not limited to) TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

>>573507

#2 cannot be enforced by words. you need encryption.

>other contractual stipulations

Needs to be removed because legally binding contractual obligations cannot interfere with your unalienable rights. You cannot agree your rights away.

Otherwise if you feel we really need to namedrop God we have the characters but I like my last iteration better. Thanks for getting an image we can share though, that will be vital for sharing in general and on twitter.

If we get

>2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

People can make you software that works that way, but in the past, attempts to have secure encryption have been met with resistance. So you still get your #2 if we go with my #2 because my #2 allows me to make your #2 a reality if that makes sense.

>>573569

Your #2 cannot be enforced without encryption, sorry, I don't agree with it.

>>573577

This is a chance to get 100k individuals who do not necessarily feel the way you do about creation to sign a petition. We'd do best to remember we want the widest audience possible.

>>573615

>why is encryption reqd?

Because IP, because commerce, because safe communications. You are using encryption right now. Even if you don't think you need it you're not in a position where you can make that decision for everyone. You're asking them not to look when I can guarantee they cannot look. I prefer my way.

>who does it protect you from?

Anyone with a computer.

>this world is going to change

Agreed.

>(((they))) will play no part!

Also agreed but irrelevant to the discussion at hand.

Count: 642

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as (but not limited to) TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

==

622 Characters. Winner Winner Chicken Dinner

==

>>573708

Trust but Verify, hence encryption, you're not going to convince me the internet doesn't require encryption.

>>573759

What you are discussing is outside the scope of the current discussion, we're here to hash out less than 800 characters of what needs to be said, not establish in 800 characters the manner in which we should dictate ourselves now and in the future. Stick to the task at hand.

>>573782

I will sleep on it and of course get Eurwtf@g's input when they return. I hope they understand that the BoR doesn't apply to non US citizens but if the US has a free internet then they have access to a free internet as well.

This Declaration shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

Char Count: 611

>>573854

Asking our gov't for god given rights doesn't sit right with me, they're our rights, I'm telling my govt that they're my rights and that I'm willing to defend them. I'm not asking my gov't for my god given rights, god gave them to me, I have to ask nobody as there is no higher authority.

>>573857

It's too wordy, the nice thing about IBOR is everybody has their own reasons IBOR should exist and I think that discussion will help us get the signatures we need rather than define why we think we need them.

This petition needs to be as agnostic as possible to have a chance at the furthest reach, nothing matters more than getting this infront of someone who can help us realize this goal.

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

Chars: 608

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

Chars: 608

Who has problems with the soundness of these demands, if you want to talk about something that does not have anything to do with IBOR, make a new thread.

>>574116

We have another 192 characters if we go with what I already rolled to talk about investigating and enforcement but I thought that particular aspect was outside of a straight 'internet bill or rights'.

I'm going to bed, see you all tomorrow.

>>574306

>You are letting perfect be the enemy of good enough. God knows my heart and intentions and it's not up to you to decide otherwise.

They are just sliding this thread.

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

===

Chars: 608

===

>>574699

>>574550

We're writing a petition where we require 100k signatures, this is not a law, no magic wording will somehow 'free' us. The petition MUST be agnostic for reach.

These aren't Sovereign Citizen rules we're playing by, if it were, we wouldn't have Soverign Citizens.

>>574744

You don't know what net neutrality is if you think #2 is net neutrality.

>Conservative voices on many large public website platforms are being censored, based solely on a differing opinion.

Wow, way to alienate half of your potential signers.

You want 100k sigs on this you'll have to get it on The_Donald, this won't move through tech forums of which there are thousands, your political ideology is irrelevant to IBOR.

>Put your ideas here

As was done.

>and stop CIRCLEJERKING over 600 characters or less

It's 800, and before it was nearly 1500 characters, (ineligible for submission).

>Stop unnecessarily constraining the situation

You need constraints so you know what you're asking for, that petition asks for nothing and doesn't attempt to solve the problem or open negotiations in a manner that shows the other party you are serious about solving the problem.

>and dont slide the petition that is now out there

It's doomed to failure for the aforementioned reasons.

>>574761

I'm not here to discuss a grand unified theory of legal theory and magic words that free us. qresearch afaik is THE place to be to follow Q and do what you can to help. We were asked specifically to make #IBOR a thing and I've packaged it in a manner that you cannot nitpick mannerism. Q brought up AT&T's IBOR document linked here:

http:// about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html

Which includes your 'needless net neutrality' statement.

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

===

Chars: 608

===

You can get liberals to sign this, lol. This version is agnostic-ally memeable even.

>>574916

I have no problem calling them Natural Rights if such a notion must be included.

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the Natural Rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our Natural Rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

===

Chars: 599

===

It was 'unalienable rights' because it came from the previous anon. They were saying it because Jefferson referred to the Bill of Rights as 'unalienable rights'.

>>575004

Let's sleep on it, no rush.

>>577247

>>577204

>#2 was written by clowns and you listened to them. This makes it illegal to stop them from DDOSing you. Think about this some more.

Not all speech is protected speech. If you think AT&T doesn't use firewalls I don't know what to tell you. If you think service providers don't use firewalls I don't know what to tell you, if you think firewalls are forced to discriminate on content, I don't know what to tell you. There's plenty of other criteria to ban traffic by like rate of accessing said service.

>Conservative voices are being censored, this is a fact. Are liberal voices being censored?

You're a dipshit if you think this is still Conservative vs. Liberal. I'm a liberal, I'm here, and your point is moot.

>Proceeds to circlejerk on 608 characters.

Proceeds to not understand character limits.

>I disagree anon. You are welcome to launch another petition, but stop shitting on the petition that is currently there.

Where's the memes? I frequent this board and guess what, you have no momentum. Your petition is DoA.

If you want to argue communists don't get censored then great, I agree. But communists don't give a fuck about IBOR or the Constitution.

And you are ultimately missing the point. A lot of programmers are liberal or simply dont give a fuck(anarchists, technocratics) so by raising the bar in your Petition to only include Conservatives immediately alienates a large portion of your potential base that WOULD care about IBOR even if they don't agree with you philosophically on other issues.

>>577321

No please keep going, it'd be helpful to compile every possible argument against it so that it can be further refined.

>>577421

Because if we don't they will.

>>577876

I tried to specify 'deserialized format of data structures' as free speech but I was told it's too complicated.

>>577876

Also SCOTUS has to be convinced that whatever we're calling 'free speech' is actually speech. They're kind of assholes like that.

https:// www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-111_f314.pdf

Here is the oral transcript of a recent 'free speech' case the SCOTUS heard. You will find they argue that creating a cake is not considered speech and the individual representing the MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD. must argue that it is speech and that the individual cannot be compelled to speak.

>>578578

I really like this. I'm not married to #2.

>>578583

That can be fixed via competition imo, I'm not sure that is actually enforceable in the modern age. Things like metadata are required for internet protocols to exist. There are also data retention laws.

>>578644

I like it, have to think about the data clause some more. PII is a good idea, it's already defined and it's already protected in some instances.

>>579201

To set the stage you need 100k signees, to get 100k signees you need an agnostic petition(memetically, politically, religiously).

>How

Dunno, Q said to do and then said to trust the plan, here we are. Round 2 is doing poorly and alienates a bunch of potential signers.

>>579203

Are we actually trying to write a Bill? Not enough characters methinks.

>>579274

Oh boy, if we're trying to include PII to include signals and other things emitted naturally in everyday life to try and combat video surveillance as well…well shit, it's a good idea but doesn't necessarily fall in the scope of this but I don't know. I don't actually know how to beat facial recognition tech without deliberately tricking it or wearing a mask. The tech isn't going back in the proverbial box so it's something we'll have to deal with.

Wow, who knew, writing up a petition for IBOR isn't easy or straightforward. /s

@Snowden

We are going LIVE -24 [comb your hair].

Re: IBOR

This scares them more than anything.

Loss of control.

Use logic.

Nothing to do w/ AT&T.

Must be regulated to prevent censorship & narrative push.

Q

https:// 8ch.net/qresearch/res/579039.html#q579914

>>580082

Hey Eurt, we're refocusing on Petition #2. #3 is in the bag if we need it.

These liberals might be interested in helping us out.

https:// medium.com/@mayoredlee/fighting-for-open-and-equal-internet-dc27bca1485f

>>580200

They want free and open internet, which is basically what we want. They're still assmad about Net Neutrality so if we can convince some liberals to ignore the Conservative victim bullshit in the petition it could spread far enough on both sides.

It's not hard to convince a liberal they're victims.

>>580240

Ok.

<Would it have fucking killed you all to pick a shorter hashtag.

>>580413

We're pushing #2, Q said to push it and since ours isn't done he's obviously referring to #2.

>>580528

It's too late to change it until #2 has expired, when it's closer to that time we'll reconvene and get our shit together, until then we have to focus on #2, I don't like #2 either but it doesn't matter what I like.

Here's some shit for the furfags. Trying to make memes that go to other fandoms and shit. Might have to make R&M memes too.

Forgot to attach meme you all never knew you didn't want until now.

>>580625

It can't be too busy.

>>580654

Says the short attentionspan of the population and the general effectiveness of memes. Meme's != infographic

>>580803

Literally stop giving meme advice.

>>580671

Nobody is reading this.

>>580905

>Recognizing an anon

>Making claims based on feelings.

What the actual fuck.

>>580671

No humor.

No aesthetic.

No theme.

Looks generated tbh.

>>580940

That has been a consistent problem throughout the Q-event.

>>580966

If it's censored then I'd think they've seriously crossed the line on our right to assemble. Someone said that playing favorites like this would lose them some kind of legal protection. The libs were able to protest Net Neutrality and if we are unable to assemble for IBOR that's kind of a smoking gun imo.

>>581225

>2003

You mean a Pre-Trump era.

>>581240

Because a Bill of Rights from an EO is a dictatorship, duh. It's Congresses job to legislate not POTUS.

>>581270

Thanks, see you at 100k.

>>581284

>Someone didn't watch SOTU

>Someone didn't listen to the USA chants

>Someone didn't read Q's post about those who were chanting being free.

>>581294

4A is underrated for sure. Encryption enforces 4A on networks you do not control.

>>581475

Shit, post 'em both places. Maybe we need an IBOR specific meme thread.

>>581511

>>581508

>>581518

>>581525

>>581538

>>581542

>>581551

>>581556

Excellent work anon. Just excellent work anon. Today you have picked up the slack, tomorrow I hope I can do the same.

Sigs have gone from 900 to 1700 in 3 hours! WE CAN DO IT!

>>581761

https:// petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2

>>582020

Q said to push it today and #2 is the only active one, it's also grown 1.3% in the last few hours meaning we're growing.

To #2 anon, maybe this will work, I said it wouldn't but looks like I was wrong, apologies.

>>582197

Frankly fuck off.

You didn't see a 1.2% growth until Q reiterated IBOR and it's importance. This holier than though skit is cute but we're adults here. Have hurt feelings? Too bad.

>>582234

>not a good leader.

Implying an anon wishes to lead.

Implying another anon should follow.

Hmm…

>>582327

All this bitching about me you could be learning how to operate an image editor and making some memes for the twitter front.

What part of it's been decided we're pushing #2 and not going for a #3 is lost on you two? Did you miss Q's posts today?

It's been decided(pic related). For some people who accuse me of not being able to fall in line you're sure off in la-la land.

>>574858

I had unalienable rights but some anon needed it to include god in some manner so it was changed to 'Natural Rights'.

>>582458

Well there's new Q posts.

Sorry to hear about the cat.

Other groups have started pushing #2.

>>582469

It's not being posted until #2 fails which it wont. Other groups are pushing #2.

>>583416

I already pointed that out, but we'll make do with what we have. In the future if we do have another opportunity we'll make sure to make it agnostic as possible for widest reach. #2 has momentum and that's all that matters, we just have to set the stage and trust the plan.

I agree it could be better, but we're not writing the actual laws just getting the ball rolling.

>>587338

The current IBOR variants are good but do not go far enough. There are other types of control or monitoring outside of the agreements listed above. Specifically:

>- IPv4 and IPv6 addresses (or whatever may supersede them) are used (agreement or not) to identify PCs and/or users. For instance, this is how one form of banning works on the chans. You've seen it other places too. The very large address space of IPv6 brings with it the capability to permanently uniquely all machines and people.

Competition can solve any implementation problem, right now distributed services to include services that use advanced routing methods are not necessarily protected speech. IPv4 and IPv6 and whatever may supersede it are simply protocols and while part of the building blocks I think are too high level for what needs to be quantified legally. Comms

>- MAC addresses are used, and rightfully required, at the electrical level of networks to identify and route messages to the correct destination. However some software allows users to specify or randomly generate a MAC address at will; this is a good thing and should be required of operating system and device vendors. Likewise, cell phone IMEI and other identifiers must be able to be altered at will.

Another thing that can be solved with software.

>- "Fingerprinting": Software has a means to identify individual people by a "browser fingerprint", "HTML5 canvas", and other techniques. Please see https:// panopticlick.eff.org for more information.

Another thing that can be solved via software.

>- Randomly generated identifiers as described above should be as truly random or pseudo-random as possible. It's not enough to alter a non-significant portion of an identifier and call it "different" when in fact it might still serve to identify the same person or device, or group of persons or devices.

Another thing that can be solved via software.

>- This is not necessarily of complete list. Geeks, marketers, and agencies might know of other techniques. Any technique, existing or new, must comply to the same rules of the IBOR to the full extent that they can.

This is specifically the problem with not hitting the root of what is necessary in an IBOR. Nobodys imagination nor our imaginations as a collective can imagine what will be needed or required when further communications infrastructure has been developed and deployed. We should specifically be referring to it as signals and communications infrastructure.

>I propose that the IBOR include concepts and words for people to alter, at will, any form of identification or enumeration used in any way on the internet.

I propose we define a test which can prove is something is communications infrastructure or not and use that as formal method of defining what is protected by IBOR.

>The above are implemented at a technical level and are easy to code and test. This is distinct from and complementary to the right to be forgotten.

The 'Right to be Forgotten' is unenforceable, how can they prove they've deleted information that can be copied billions of times in seconds. Once you connect to a server you do not control (and sometimes before then if you're not using crypto) the cat's out of the bag. Decentralized platforms will eventually take over (looking like sooner rather than later from where I'm sitting) and the ones that succeed will include all the guarantees you and everybody else are asking for possibly in more flavors than anyone can currently imagine.

>Further, any form of identification history must be erased from systems. Providers must not store the IMEIs, MACs, fingerprints, etc, that each user or device has used in the past. This includes backup facilities.

Needs new tech for this. Unenforceable, nobody can prove it was deleted.

#2 is doing really well. What's working is spamming youtube channels with it. Find a live streamer and tell them to sign #InternetBillofRights and ALWAYS include the link! https:// petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2

>>640173

It's already been decided. Help or get the fuck out.