I have been sent by >>572567
thank you .
This is what I present you as a draft. I am here upon Q's orders to Organize, at POTUS service.
I agree established terminology will be best. I thought about these two terms in debate for a while.
The thought at the time was the Connector is a user who chose to connect to the IOT. Once becoming the Connector the IBOR jurisdiction will kick in.
This was my logic at 2 A.M.
User seemed to be more malleable as a term in court as opposed to a defined direct connector.
That being said, your point is still not negated, As long as User is clearly defined in the declaration it would serve Ideally, as you are proposing.