#2 is bad. We don't need a petition for net neutrality
I'm confused why the petition needs to have all the details
The petition just needs to light the fire.
The board here provides the ideas.
Sign and push the petition that is started.
Put your ideas here and stop CIRCLEJERKING over 600 characters or less
Stop unnecessarily constraining the situation and dont slide the petition that is now out there
https:// petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2
>You don't know what net neutrality is if you think #2 is net neutrality.
#2 is net neutrality. Best way to convince someone you know what you are talking about is to directly attack their intelligence, right? How very shill like of you.
>Conservative voices on many large public website platforms are being censored, based solely on a differing opinion.
>Wow, way to alienate half of your potential signers.
You don't seem to understand what alienation is. Conservative voices are being censored, this is a fact. Are liberal voices being censored? No. A valid example of Alienation would be if it was stated that conservative voices were more important, or attempted to blame liberal voices for this censorship. Nothing alienating is written. You seem to have a problem with the use of a word in our petition. A good analogy here would be if the term mankind was used in the petition, to which the above argument from you would be… way to alienate half of your potential signers? I think not.
>It's 800, and before it was nearly 1500 characters…
Proceeds to circlejerk on 608 characters.
>It's doomed to failure for the aforementioned reasons.
I disagree anon. You are welcome to launch another petition, but stop shitting on the petition that is currently there.