At what point does it become mathematically impossible?

Q keeps asking that, but he has to know there are autists here.

>>5723778 (PB)

Q can't be talking about zero deltas as proof of anything. He's have to know that we would actually do the math.

For zero delta to be meaningful, Q would need to announce in advance, exactly what minute POTUS was going to post . . . or there would have to be virtually identical content.

We've seen similar content, but close enough to convince me that Q is talking about zero deltas.

I think he's referring to the fact that Q has foreshadowed real world events that only later became clear.

>>5724047

Or to take our eyes off the Lisa Page testimony that Lorreta Lynch made sure that the Clinton server investigation would go nowhere before she recused herself.

>>5724363

21 days would not be enough time for the experiment.

Q has been posting for 18 months now. There are 5 zero deltas (that I know of) where Q posted first.

18 months divided by 5 would allow more than 3 months of random attempts in order to match Q's success rates.

>>5724442

Navy Seal copypasta gone insane.

>>5724482

I was just responding to the experiment proposed. 21 days with 7 posts per day would not be the proper compression.

You could take it down to just one day. If POTUS posts x times per day average and Q posts y times per day, average, and there are 1440 minutes in a day, then:

1440 divided by x divided by y minus one are the odds of a zero delta on that day.

But, you have to multiply that by the number of days in the period.

>>5724584

More accurate probability using exponents.

In the attached formula, to calculate the odds of a zero delta on any given day, just substitute 1339/1440 for 354/365, and substitute the average number of Q and POTUS posts per day for n.

It won't be quite right, but it's close enough to show that zero deltas would occur more commonly than one would expect.