>>5724592 lb
I follow your etymological works there anon. but relevance? are you responding to another post or making exclamaition?
>>5724592 lb
I follow your etymological works there anon. but relevance? are you responding to another post or making exclamaition?
damn good question. need be asked during planning for any long haul. if moving along known geogrpahic route, a good answer I heard was post office of next city on route. but on the webs, would it be known temporal markers? just agree on spot and flash it with simultaneous dig dumps at the agreed time?