>>5725703

>>5725707

>>5725760

>>5725812

>>5725800

Possible on both counts. Discard the POTUS twat about it being a "massacre". Remember that POTUS generally accepts the official story (in his official capacity) because you never let your enemies know what you know, or think.

>>5725817

No disagreement. However, that doesn't really go with the joke.

So, yes, the guys chewed their friggen arms off.

>>5725881

This meme is just flat-out great friggen work.

Bravo zulu.

>>5725901

ANONS -

It occurs to me that the NZ mass shooting might not have been a false flag, but the videos allowed to be "leaked" from it might have appeared to be contrived…

Because our analysis is very quick and extremely insightful.

Consider this: If the DS media arm withholds video showing it to be a legitimate shooting, and the Anons' initial analysis is "false flag" based upon incomplete information, then (((they))) have set us up to provide a narrative that makes us look like a bunch of LARPing conspiracy theorists.

Eggsackly what I'd do if I wanted to try and discredit QResearch as a source of truthful information. The later videos that get released become informative proof that the shooting wasn't a FF, and we take the blame for being a bunch of wackadoos.

Food for thought. Sometimes we might be too fast on the trigger.

>>5726057

>>5726059

I'm just spiff-balling an idea, but if it was me I'd want to run a counter-counter measures operation on us to yank our credit.

Since I'm not a photo-analysis autist, I can't say one way or another.

Just offering the thought that other eyes are on this board (at least Limbaugh appears likely) and they may or may not take from it. If we pull the trigger too soon on FF or genuine, then we're the ones with egg on our collective face.

HTF do we know, and how to determine? I have no fucking idea. In fact, this isn't even a caution, because that runs counter to the free-speech purpose of this board.

It's times like this that I wish we had a "hive-mind" arbiter.

C'est la vie.

>>5726144

Now, that's some top shelf shit. KEK!

>>5726154

Hoax, as in "it didn't happen at all"?

How 'bout:

1) FF

2) Hoax

3) Genuine (even if it was Cabal-prompted)

My area of knowledge isn't photo-analysis, although I can hum a few bars. I'll leave it to the folks who know moar about that and pay attention to what they say. As to which, I haven't determined.

Don't try and ramrod me with you as the definitive source, though. Persuade me, don't fuck with me.

Because I fuck with you back. And at that, I'm a fucking master.

So, kindly, persuade with your views.