>>5726235 lb
<The entire theory was based on one arrest, clinton, than mass arrests.
Nope, very wrong. That's just a small piece of it all.
For me, like many, the starting point was the weekend of Nov.4-5 2017, when there were plenty rumors (before Q) of riots.
All eyes were on US... and then the purge in SA happened. Look here, not here. Game theory. Moves and countermoves, understandable to those who can read & think - and adapt.
Then indictments were noticed, crumbs kept coming, etc, etc.
>You guys keep trying to go back and rewrite history but I know better I've been here the whole time. You're trying to go back and change what it really was to try to make it more like what it has become. You aren't fooling anybody but yourselves.
nice projection, you make it too easy.
About Clinton arrest posts, read again: >>5726461
>That's just a small piece of it all.
Had to grab our attention.
It did.
Then SA purge, and many confirmations came in, to help us understand.
Obviously, you still don't - or pretend not to, which is more likely.
Anons, fuck's sake, that legmuscles beast is an already old muhdick slide.
Shouldn't be that many fools still biting, at this point.
Come on, you're not even trying, put some effort into it, at least, if you expect us to play along.
You've had your chance.
Read again, none of what you say adresses points made - to the contrary, it just runs away from them.
>whoever it is spamming this gal
it's muhdick.
don't have a fresh hash history cap, but it's him-them
yup.
and that "this board is under surveillance" copypasta with the heat-vision pisser.
and "anons would you hit it?" slider.
and thunderthighs.
and "Q fizzled bigly"
and "Q needs to get something on the scoreboard".
looks like many shills but mostly all the same pool of "content"
> the retarded fuckheads like you who keep taking the bait and shitting up the bread
definitely
Trudat, worth a good kek when i finally gave it a click sometime.
But the copypost almost always gets at least a few replies, usually the same lame "funny" replies - but the answers to "would you hit it" are even more annying and not-as-clever-as-they-think-they-are
>From my perspective, someone way paying to organize riots.
Absolutely.
Massive astroturf, and the most fascinating part was that on both sides, people noticed, were aware and cautious: i saw reports of conservatives worried about the riots making them look bad, and i saw lefties - far lefties, even - worried about the riots making them look bad.
Turns out the blatant astroturfing was all part of the plan - disinfo necessary.
Frustating a bit, maybe, but not that hard to understand and overcome
Despite even early Q boatfaggin somewhat
obviously both, or neither would exist/be here